State v. Taylor (2000)
green
· 76 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 6 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200020132026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
State of Washington v. Shelby Leigh Gibson (2020)
State v. Taylor, 140 Wn.2d at 233 (2000); State v. Baker, 136 Wn.
green
State v. Goodman (2004)
"Words in a charging document are read as a whole, construed according to common sense, and include facts which are necessarily implied." Id. at 109 , 812 P.2d 86 (emphasis added); see also State v. Taylor, 140 Wash.2d 229, 243 , 996 P.2d 571 (2000).
green
State v. Goodman (2004)
“Words in a charging document are read as a whole, construed according to common sense, and include facts which are necessarily implied.” Id. at 109 (emphasis added); see also State v. Taylor, 140 Wn.2d 229, 243 , 996 P.2d 571 (2000).
green
State v. Borrero (2002)
See Taylor, 140 Wash.2d at 245 , 996 P.2d 571 ("One does not, without intent, push, kick or punch another."); Khlee, 106 Wash.App. at 25 , 22 P.3d 1264 ("One can knowingly possess a gun without knowing it to be stolen.").
green
State v. Mendoza-Solorio (2001)
See State v. Taylor, 140 Wn.2d 229, 236 , 996 P.2d 571 (2000) (discussing constitutional origins of “essential elements rule” governing adequacy of charging documents).
discussing constitutional origins of “essential elements rule” governing adequacy of charging documents
green
State v. Mendoza-Solorio (2001)
See State v. Taylor, 140 Wash.2d 229, 236 , 996 P.2d 571 (2000) (discussing constitutional origins of "essential elements rule" governing adequacy of charging documents).
discussing constitutional origins of "essential elements rule" governing adequacy of charging documents