Wells Eddleman v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1987)
green
· 10 citation events
across 5 courts.
Showing the 2 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
See Eddleman v. NRC, 825 F.2d 46 , 48 (4th Cir.1987) (noting there is no right to a hearing under 10 C.F.R. § 2.206 ).
See Eddleman, 825 F.2d at 48-49 (holding “that the Commission was not in error in examining facts outside the formal record”); see also Mass. v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm’n, 878 F.2d at 1524 (“The Commonwealth’s argument that the NRC has ‘mischaracterized’ and ‘distorted’ the record is, in reality, a complaint that the NRC did not give greater weight to evidence provided by state and local officials and drew conclusions from the evidence that were different than the one’s…
holding “that the Commission was not in error in examining facts outside the formal record”