How cited: Cluster 492454 · Go Syfert

Cluster 492454 (1987)

green · 54 citation events across 11 courts. Showing the 21 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198720062026
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
United States v. Articles of Drug, 825 F.2d 1238, 1247 (8th Cir.1987).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
United States v. Articles of Drug, 825 F.2d 1238, 1247 (8th Cir.1987).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
We believe that the Government has read Abernathy too broadly. 6 See United States v. Articles of Drug, 825 F.2d 1238, 1249 (8th Cir.1987) (discretionary function exception applies only where action required consideration of policy); Georgia Casualty & Sur.
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
We believe that the Government has read Abernathy too broadly. 6 See United States v. Articles of Drug, 825 F.2d 1238, 1249 (8th Cir.1987) (discretionary function exception applies only where action required consideration of policy); Georgia Casualty & Sur.
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
United States v. Articles of Drug, 825 F.2d 1238, 1243 (8th Cir.1987).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo. · 2 citations in this opinion
This argument would not prevent me from enjoining these activities in any event, because defendants may not "successfully defend against the issuance of an injunction by asserting that the injunction would drive it out of business." U.S. v. Articles of Drug, 825 F.2d 1238, 1247 (8th Cir.1987).
Rule Authority · W.D. Ark.
Bank v. Manges, 900 F.2d 795 , 799-800 (5th Cir. 1990). the arbitration order); U.S. v. Articles of Drug, 825 F.2d 1238, 1247 (8th Cir. 1987) (holding that preliminary injunction was flawed because it cited to other documents to detail what products a party could not market or sell instead of listing the products in the order); E.W.
holding that preliminary injunction was flawed because it cited to other documents to detail what products a party could not market or sell instead of listing the products in the order
green Parada v. Anoka County (2021)
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
The Court must also determine whether an “injunction is necessary to prevent future violations.” United States v. Articles of Drug, 825 F.2d 1238, 1248 (8th Cir. 1987).
green Opinion No. (1997) (1997)
Rule Authority · Neb. Att'y Gen.
Id. at 1244.
Rule Authority · S.D. Ohio
United States v. Park, 421 U.S. 658, 672-73 , 95 S.Ct. 1903, 1911 , 44 L.Ed.2d 489 (1975); United States v. Articles of Drug, 825 F.2d 1238, 1246 (8th Cir.1987); Torigian Laboratories, 577 F.Supp. at 1526 .
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Articles of Drug, 825 F.2d 1238, 1247 (8th Cir.1987).
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Articles of Drug, 825 F.2d 1238, 1247 (8th Cir.1987).
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See Lyons, 461 U.S. at 106 , 103 S.Ct. 1660 (identifying *1039 official police policy as an indicator of future police conduct), and United States v. Articles of Drug, 825 F.2d 1238, 1248 (8th Cir.1987) (citing a “pattern of noncompliance” to justify injunctive relief).
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See Lyons, 461 U.S. at 106 (identifying official police policy as an indicator of future police conduct), and United States v. Articles of Drug, 825 F.2d 1238, 1248 (8th Cir. 1987) (citing a "pattern of noncompliance" to justify injunctive relief).
citing a "pattern of noncompliance" to justify injunctive relief
green Butler v. Dowd (1992)
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Articles of Drug, 825 F.2d 1238, 1247-48 (8th Cir.1987); see also Orantes-Hernandez v. Thornburgh, 919 F.2d 549 (9th Cir.1990); Brown v. Trustees of Boston Univ., 891 F.2d 337 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 , 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990) (classwide relief appropriate only where there is a properly certified class).
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Articles of Drug, 825 F.2d 1238, 1247-48 (8th Cir.1987); see also Orantes-Hernandez v. Thornburgh, 919 F.2d 549 (9th Cir.1990); Brown v. Trustees of Boston Univ., 891 F.2d 337 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 , 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990) (classwide relief appropriate only where there is a properly certified class).
Cited (see also) · 8th Cir. · signal: see also
See also United States v. Articles of Drug, 825 F.2d 1238, 1249 (8th Cir.1987); Georgia Casualty & Sur.
Cited · 4th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Articles of Drug, 825 F.2d 1238, 1248-49 (8th Cir.1987); States Marine Lines, Inc. v. Shultz, 498 F.2d 1146, 1148 (4th Cir.1974).
Cited (see also) · D.D.C. · signal: see also
Grant Co., 345 U.S. 629, 633 , 73 S.Ct. 894 , 97 L.Ed. 1303 (1953); see also United States v. Articles of Drug, 825 F.2d 1238, 1248 (8th Cir.1987) (“A district court may issue an injunction if it concludes that the injunction is necessary to prevent future violations.”).
Cited (see also) · N.D. Okla. · signal: see also
Diapulse, 457 F.2d at 29 (citations omitted); see also U.S. v. Articles of Drug, 825 F.2d 1238, 1248 (8th Cir.1987) (a defendant may not successfully defend against the issuance of an injunction by assertions that the injunction would drive it out of business.). 17.
Cited (see also) · D.S.C. · signal: see also
Id.; Phillips v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp., 602 F.2d 616 (4th Cir.1979) (a future injury of uncertain date and incalculable magnitude is irreparable harm, and protection from such an injury is a legitimate end of injunctive relief); see also United States v. Articles of Drug, 825 F.2d 1238 (8th Cir.1987) (district court may issue an injunction if it concludes that the injunction is necessary to prevent future violations).