Goodwin v. Wright (2000)

green · 20 citation events across 8 courts. Showing the 4 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 4

Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

200020132026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Fujitec America, Inc. v. AXIS Surplus Insurance Company (2020)

Rule Authority · S.D. Ohio · 2 citations in this opinion

Plaintiffs assert those cases clearly support plaintiffs’ interpretation of the language at issue: i.e., if Fujitec’s “work has been put to its intended use” - as it had been before the Shannon accident - “before all the work called for in the service contract had been performed,” then the work is “deemed completed.” (Id. at 4-5, citing Goodwin v. Wright, 100 Wash. App. 631, 643-44 (2000); Arch Specialty Insurance, Case No. 14CV85245; James, 981 F.2d 810 ).

green Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Patrick Archer Construction, Inc. (2004)

Rule Authority · Wash. Ct. App.

Goodwin v. Wright, 100 Wn.

emphasis added

green Canal Indemnity Company v. Adair Homes Inc (2011)

Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: see also

Co. of Wash., 155 Wash.App. 133 , 229 P.3d 857, 861 (2010) (“When faced with clear and unambiguous language, we enforce the policy as written.”) (citation omitted); see also Goodwin v. Wright, 100 Wash.App. 631 , 6 P.3d 1, 8 (2000) (holding that a similar PCOH exclusion unambiguously barred coverage for completed work).

holding that a similar PCOH exclusion unambiguously barred coverage for completed work

green Canal Indemnity Co. v. Adair Homes, Inc. (2010)

Cited · W.D. Wash. · signal: see

See, ie., Goodwin v. Wright, 100 Wash.App. 631 , 6 P.3d 1 (2000); Bresee Homes, Inc. v. Farmers Ins.