Landstar Inway, Inc. v. Samrow (2014)
green
· 45 citation events
across 7 courts.
Showing the 8 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201520202026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
George Tershakovec v. Ford Motor Company, Inc. (2023)
Washing- ton courts have held that a fraud plaintiff must prove, among other things, “the listener’s reliance on the false representation, [] the lis- tener’s right to rely on the representation, and [] damage from re- liance on the false representation.” Landstar Inway Inc. v. Samrow, 325 P.3d 327, 337 (Wash. App. 2014) (citing Baertschi v. Jordan, 413 P.2d 657, 660 (Wash. 1966)).
citing Baertschi v. Jordan, 413 P.2d 657, 660 (Wash. 1966)
green
In re: Nathan Lewis and Sarah Lewis; Tamara Baughn v. Nathan Lewis, Sarah Lewis, and Farmhouse Legacy CoO., L… (2026)
Regarding the second element, the plaintiff must “show that disregarding the corporate form is necessary to avoid the consequences of intentional misconduct harmful to the plaintiff.” Landstar Inway Inc. v. Samrow, 181 Wash. App. 109, 123 (2014) (citing Meisel, 97 Wn.2d at 410 ).
citing Meisel, 97 Wn.2d at 410
green
In re: Nathan Lewis and Sarah Lewis; Tamara Baughn v. Nathan Lewis, Sarah Lewis, and Farmhouse Legacy CoO., L… (2026)
Regarding the second element, the plaintiff must “show that disregarding the corporate form is necessary to avoid the consequences of intentional misconduct harmful to the plaintiff.” Landstar Inway Inc. v. Samrow, 181 Wash. App. 109, 123 (2014) (citing Meisel, 97 Wn.2d at 410 ).
citing Meisel, 97 Wn.2d at 410
green
Douglas v. Bank of America NA (2020)
Plaintiffs in Washington 15 courts must establish two elements for courts to disregard the corporate form: (1) “an 16 abuse of the corporate form”; and (2) a demonstration that “disregarding the corporate 17 form is necessary to avoid the consequences of intentional misconduct harmful to the 18 plaintiff.” Landstar Inway, Inc. v. Samrow, 325 P.3d 327, 336 (Wash. Ct. App. 2014) 19 (citing Meisel v. M&N Modern Hydraulic Press Co., 645 P.2d 689, 692-93 (Wash. 20 1982)).
green
Miley v. Pylypets (2019)
Landstar Inway Inc. v. Samrow, 325 P.3d 327, 337 (Wash. Ct. App. 4 2014); Lindberg v. Roseth, 46 P.3d 518, 522 (Idaho Ct. App. 2001).
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 84 F.Supp.2d 263, 268-69 (D.R.I.2000); Shah v. Racetrac Petroleum Co., 338 F.3d 557, 571 (6th Cir.2003); Frankoff v. Norman, 448 S.W.3d at 84 (Tex.App.-Hous. (14th Dist.) 2014); Bank of Montreal v. Signet Bank, 193 F.3d 818, 827 (4th Cir.1999); Landstar Inway, Inc. v. Samrow, 181 Wash.App. 109 , 325 P.3d 327, 337 (2014).
green
Pister v. State, Department of Revenue (2015)
Landstar Inway, Inc. v. Samrow, 181 Wash. App. 109 , 325 P.3d 327, 339 (2014).
green
Villafan v. Northwest Motorsport LLC (2024)
Liebergesell v. Evans, 93 Wn.2d 881 , 891–94, 613 P.2d 1170 (1980); accord 13 Landstar Inway, Inc. v. Samrow, 181 Wn.