Abercrombie v. Office Of The Comptroller Of The Currency (1987)
green
· 64 citation events
across 14 courts.
Showing the 19 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198720062026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Abercrombie v. Clarke (1991)
Abercrombie I, 833 F.2d at 676.
green
Abercrombie v. Clarke (1990)
Abercrombie I, 833 F.2d at 676.
green
United States v. Wesley R. McKinney (1992)
Thus, because the Board's final order was not blatantly lawless, the statutory authority exception to withdrawal of jurisdiction was unavailable. 4 See Abercrombie, 833 F.2d at 675.
green
Glenn A. Zipp, Regional Director of the Thirty-Third Region of the National Labor Relations Board and Nationa… (1997)
See Leedom v. Kyne, 358 U.S. 184, 188 , 79 S.Ct. 180, 183-84 , 3 L.Ed.2d 210 (1958); Abercrombie v. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 833 F.2d 672, 675 (7th Cir.1987).
green
Zipp v. Geske & Sons, Inc. (1997)
See Leedom v. Kyne, 358 U.S. 184, 188 , 79 S.Ct. 180, 183-84 , 3 L.Ed.2d 210 (1958); Abercrombie v. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 833 F.2d 672, 675 (7th Cir.1987).
green
Alyce Tinsley v. Methodist Hospital of Indiana, Inc. (1995)
Bender, 475 U.S. at 541 ; Abercrombie, 833 F.2d at 674.
green
Lawrence Aug Pulchin and Christina F. Pulchin v. Kenneth Kubsch, M.D. And John Blackburn (1995)
Bender, 475 U.S. at 541 ; Abercrombie, 833 F.2d at 674.
green
Doral Bank v. Federal Deposit Insurance (2014)
Lockerty v. Phillips, 319 U.S. 182, 187 , 63 S.Ct. 1019 , 87 L.Ed. 1339 (1943); Abercrombie v. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 833 F.2d 672, 674 (7th Cir.1987).
See Zipp v. Geske & Sons, Inc., 103 F.3d 1379, 1383 (7th Cir.1997); Abercrombie v. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 833 F.2d 672, 675 (7th Cir.1987) (noting that statutory authority exception should be narrowly construed); Hunt, 591 F.2d at 1236 (describing exhaustion requirement and clear’ right exception).
This exception allows a district court to enjoin agency action in cases in which the agency has exceeded a “plain and unambiguous statutory command or prohibition ... in circumstances where no adequate alternative judicial remedy exists.” Abercrombie, 833 F.2d at 675.
green
First National Bank of Chicago v. Steinbrink (1993)
It authorizes review by the district court only upon a showing of “ ‘blatantly lawless’ action—in circumstances where no adequate alternative judicial remedy exists for the unlawful activity’s victims.” Abercrombie, 833 F.2d at 675.
green
Bank of Louisiana v. F.D.I.C. (2019)
See Abercrombie v. Office of Comptroller of Currency , 833 F.2d 672 , 677 (7th Cir. 1987) (holding that "§ 1818(i)(1)... expressly and unequivocally deprived the district courts of jurisdiction over [civil money penalty] assessments by the Comptroller under § 1818(i)(2)(i)").
holding that "§ 1818(i)(1)... expressly and unequivocally deprived the district courts of jurisdiction over [civil money penalty] assessments by the Comptroller under § 1818(i)(2)(i)"
green
Hindes v. Federal Deposit Insurance (1998)
See, e.g., Abercrombie v. Office of the Comptroller of Currency, 833 F.2d 672 , 674r-75 (7th Cir.1987); First Nat’l Bank of Grayson v. Conover, 715 F.2d 234, 236 (6th Cir.1983); Groos Nat’l Bank, 573 F.2d at 895.
green
Hindes v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (1998)
See, e.g., Abercrombie v. Office of the Comptroller of Currency, 833 F.2d 672 , 674-75 (7th Cir.1987); First Nat'l Bank of Grayson v. Conover, 715 F.2d 234, 236 (6th Cir.1983); Groos Nat'l Bank, 573 F.2d at 895.
See, e.g., Abercrombie v. OCC, 833 F.2d 672 , 676-77 (7th Cir.1987) (“As a practical matter, [persons] who know they are liable for a specified amount for each day a violation continues would be likely to cure the violation in a short order.”). .The Director opined that control violations which involved joint participation by individuals and partnerships fell under both the Holding Company Act and the Control Act, but that the Control Act did not apply to transactions which …
See, e.g., Abercrombie v. OCC, 833 F.2d 672 , 676-77 (7th Cir.1987) ("As a practical matter, [persons] who know they are liable for a specified amount for each day a violation continues would be likely to cure the violation in a short order.") 15 The Director opined that control violations which involved joint participation by individuals and partnerships fell under both the Holding Company Act and the Control Act, but that the Control Act did not apply to transactions which…
As the Seventh Circuit observed in Squillacote, the Kyne exception is grounded in “the unavailability under [Section] 10 of the Act of judicial review of the challenged Board action, with the result that denial of district court review would have resulted in loss of the right.” Squillacote, 561 F.2d at 39; accord Abercrombie v. Office of Comptroller of Currency, 833 F.2d 672 , 675 (7th Cir. 1987) (noting exception’s availability only where agency takes “‘blatantly lawless’ a…
noting exception’s availability only where agency takes “‘blatantly lawless’ action. . . in circumstances where no adequate alternative judicial remedy exists for the unlawful activity’s victims”
See Abercrombie v. Office of Comptroller of Currency, 833 F.2d 672 , 674 (7th Cir.1987).
green
Lang v. Ryan (1991)
See Abercrombie v. Office of Comptroller of Currency, 833 F.2d 672 , 677 (7th Cir.1987) (“litigation expense and attendant inconvenience do not constitute irreparable injury sufficient to justify judicial intervention into pending agency proceedings”) (citing Rosenthal & Co. v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm’n, 614 F.2d 1121, 1128 (7th Cir.1980)).