How cited: State v. W.D. · Go Syfert

State v. W.D. (2013)

green · 19 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 9 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 3 citations in this opinion
Id. at 704.
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
On appeal, the State argues that the trial court erred in dismissing the petition based on our holding in W.D. 1 In that case, we held that section 985.0301(6) “is fairly viewed as authorizing the court to elect to end its jurisdiction over a child at any time following the initial adjudicatory hearing — not as permitting the trial court to use its discretion to terminate jurisdiction to put an end to the prosecution before the case ever reaches adjudication on the merits.” …
emphasis added
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
In that case, we held that section 985.0301(6) “is fairly viewed as authorizing the court to elect, to end its jurisdiction over a child at any time following the initial adjudicatory hearing — hot'as permitting the trial court to use its discretion to terminate jurisdiction to put an end to the prosecution before' the case ever reaches adjudication on the merits.” Id. at 704 (emphasis added).
emphasis added
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
See State v. J.C., 141 So. 3d 756, 757 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); State v. W.D., 112 So. 3d 702, 704 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
See § 985.0301(6), Fla. Stat. (2013); State v. J.C., 141 So.3d 756, 757 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); State v. W.D., 112 So.3d 702, 708 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
See § 985.0301(6), Fla. Stat. (2013); State v. J.C., 141 So.3d 756, 757 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); State v. W.D., 112 So.3d 702, 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).
green State v. K.M. (2015)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
See State v. J.C., 141 So.3d 756, 757 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); State v. W.D., 112 So.3d 702, 704 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
This court in J.C. held that the “trial court impermissibly relied on section 985.0301(6) to terminate its jurisdiction over J.C. and ‘put an end to the prosecution before the case ever reache[d] adjudication on the merits.’” Id. (quoting State v. W.D., 112 So.3d 702, 704 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)).
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
We have previously instructed that “it is the state attorney, not the trial court[], who ‘has complete discretion in making the decision to charge and prosecute.’ ” State v. W.D., 112 So.3d 702, 704-05 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (quoting Cleveland v. State, 417 So.2d 653, 654 (Fla.1982)).
quoting Cleveland v. State, 417 So.2d 653, 654 (Fla.1982)