Brown v. State (2013)

green · 8 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 5

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Daontae Terrell Scott v. State of Florida (2017)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: cf. · 2 citations in this opinion

See Knight v. State, 770 So.2d 663, 669-70 (Fla. 2000) (citing Lamb); McCarthy v. State, 731 So.2d 778, 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Lamb, 535 So.2d at 699 ; cf. Brown v. State, 113 So.3d 134, 142 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (where trial court renewed offer of counsel prior to the start of jury selection, court was not required to renew offer at the start of each day of the multi-day trial); Harris v. State, 687 So.2d 29 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (trial court was not required to renew offer o…

where trial court renewed offer of counsel prior to the start of jury selection, court was not required to renew offer at the start of each day of the multi-day trial

green Andrew Elswick v. State of Florida (2018)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

“For a criminal defendant’s right to choose the manner of representation to be meaningful, this right ‘must apply at least at each crucial stage of the prosecution,’ which is ‘any stage that may significantly affect the outcome of the proceedings.’” Brown v. State, 113 So. 3d 134, 141 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (quoting Traylor v. State, 596 So. 2d 957 , 968 & nn.23-24 (Fla. 1992)).

quoting Traylor v. State, 596 So. 2d 957 , 968 & nn.23-24 (Fla. 1992)

green Williams v. State (2014)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

This appeal ensued. 2 In Brown v. State, 113 So.3d 134, 137-38 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), we described the appropriate steps that must be undertaken when a criminal defendant asks the trial court to discharge appointed counsel: An indigent’s right to court-appointed counsel necessarily includes the right to effective representation by counsel.

green James v. State of Florida (2025)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Brown v. State, 113 So. 3d 134, 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (“Defense counsel specifically addressed all of Brown’s complaints and adequately explained counsel’s reasons for proceeding as he had done thus far.

green Neal v. State (2014)

Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see also

The court noted: “A defendant’s right to have court-appointed counsel discharged and right to represent himself becomes meaningless and a source of gamesmanship if the trial court has to offer counsel to the defendant each time he appears in court.” Id. at 670 n. 6; see also Brown v. State, 113 So.3d 134, 142 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).