Cluster 507168 (1988)
green
· 25 citation events
across 10 courts.
Showing the 15 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198820072026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
George, 882 F.2d 1485 , 1489 n. 5 (10th Cir.1989) (same), Pulido v. Bennett, 848 F.2d 880, 885-86 (8th Cir.1988) (same), modified on other grounds, 860 F.2d 296 (8th Cir.1988), and Freedom from Religion Found., Inc. v. Zielke, 845 F.2d 1463 , 1470 (7th Cir.1988) (same).
George, 882 F.2d 1485 , 1489 n. 5 (10th Cir.1989) (same), Pulido v. Bennett, 848 F.2d 880, 885-86 (8th Cir.1988) (same), modified on other grounds, 860 F.2d 296 (8th Cir.1988), and Freedom from Religion Found., Inc. v. Zielke, 845 F.2d 1463 , 1470 (7th Cir.1988) (same).
green
Rudy Pulido John M. Swomley And, G. Hugh Wamble v. Lauro F. Cavazos, Individually and as Secretary of U.S. De… (1991)
Pulido v. Bennett, 848 F.2d 880, 889 (8th Cir.1988). 3 About one month after this court affirmed the district court's dismissal, the Supreme Court held that taxpayers have standing to bring first amendment establishment clause challenges to programs such as Title I. 2 Bowen v. Kendrick, 487 U.S. 589, 618-20 , 108 S.Ct. 2562, 2579-80 , 101 L.Ed.2d 520 (1988).
green
Pulido v. Cavazos (1991)
Pulido v. Bennett, 848 F.2d 880, 889 (8th Cir.1988).
Pulido v. Bennett, 848 F.2d 880, 886 (8th Cir.1988).
green
Abuirshaid v. Johnson (2015)
This issue need not be reached here, as the constitutional claims are properly dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. .See also United States v. Fausto, 484 U.S. 439, 448-49 , 108 S.Ct. 668 , 98 L.Ed.2d 830 (1988) (providing that where a specific statute provides subject matter jurisdiction, general federal question jurisdiction is not applicable); Pulido v. Bennett, 848 F.2d 880, 886 (8th Cir.1988) (stating that "[i]t is well established that when a statute spec…
green
Heartland Academy Community Church v. Waddle (2004)
Dist. v. Wilhoit, 854 F.Supp. 1430, 1435 (E.D.Ark.1994) (quoting Pulido v. Bennett, 848 F.2d 880, 887 (8th Cir.1988)).
green
Conway School District v. Wilhoit (1994)
The Eighth Circuit held that the declaratory judgment statute “does not expand the District Courts’ jurisdiction, but merely authorizes them to declare the legal rights of parties in cases over which they would otherwise have jurisdiction.” Pulido v. Bennett, 848 F.2d 880, 887 (8th Cir.1988).
green
Don Huizenga v. ISD No. 11 (2025)
All a taxpayer—“in his capacity as a district taxpayer”—needs to show is “a measurable appropriation or disbursement of school-district funds occasioned solely by the activities complained of.” Doremus, 342 U.S. at 434 (second quotation); Everson v. Bd. of Educ. of Ewing Twp., 330 U.S. 1, 3 (1947) (first quotation); see also Pulido v. Bennett, 848 F.2d 880, 886 (8th Cir. 1988) -6- (denying state and municipal taxpayer standing when “no state or local tax funds” were used in …
green
Jane Doe v. Beaumont Independent School District (1999)
See Pulido v. Bennett, 848 F.2d 880, 888 (8th Cir.1988) ("[b]ecause [the plaintiff] ... sued as next friend of the children in her care, her standing depended on that of the children"), rev'd on other grounds, 860 F.2d 296 , 297-98 (8th Cir.1988).
See Pulido v. Bennett, 848 F.2d 880, 888 (8th Cir.1988) ("[bjecause [the plaintiff] ... sued as next friend of the children in her care, her standing depended on that of the children”), rev'd on other grounds, 860 F.2d 296 , 297-98 (8th Cir.1988).
See Pulido v. Bennett, 848 F.2d 880, 888 (8th Cir.), rev'd on other grounds on rehearing, 860 F.2d 296 (8th Cir.1988); see also Hope, Inc. v. County of DuPage, 738 F.2d 797, 803 (7th Cir.1984) (applying "clearly erroneous" rule to standing determination in case involving fourteenth amendment claim).
See Pulido v. Bennett, 848 F.2d 880, 888 (8th Cir.), rev’d on other grounds on rehearing, 860 F.2d 296 (8th Cir.1988); see also Hope, Inc. v. County of DuPage, 738 F.2d 797, 803 (7th Cir.1984) (applying “clearly erroneous” rule to standing determination in case involving fourteenth amendment claim).
green
Redman v. Federal Aviation Administration (1991)
See Pulido v. Bennett, 848 F.2d 880, 886-87 (8th Cir.), modified, 860 F.2d 296 (8th Cir.1988) (where statute specifically provides for exclusive jurisdiction in one court, Congress’ specific grant of jurisdiction takes precedence over a general grant of jurisdiction); Southwestern Bell Tel.
green
Pulido v. Cavazos (1989)
See Pulido v. Bennett, 848 F.2d 880 (8th Cir.1988). 4 Shortly after the Eighth Circuit issued its decision the Supreme Court, in Bowen v. Kendrick, 487 U.S. 589 , 108 S.Ct. 2562 , 101 L.Ed.2d 520 (1988), held that taxpayers have standing to bring first amendment establishment clause challenges to programs such as Title I.