Allied Corporation v. United States International Trade Commission (1988)
green
· 21 citation events
across 5 courts.
Showing the 4 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198820072026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
We rejected the intervenor’s argument, explaining that although the “ITC finds au- thority to modify an existing exclusion order in § 337(h)[,] when it actually modifies that order and issues the modi- fied order it is making an appealable final determination under subsection (d), (e), or (f).” Allied Corp., 850 F.2d at 1580.
green
Cline v. Hawke (2002)
See 5 U.S.C. § 704 (requiring final agency action for judicial review under Administrative Procedures Act); see also Allied Corp. v. United States Int’l Trade Comm’n, 850 F.2d 1573 , 1578 (Fed.
"That an agency may choose to render advisory opinions cannot create for one displeased with its advice a cause of action cognizable in an Article III court."
green
Levy v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (2001)
See, e.g., Allied Corp. v. ITC, 850 F.2d 1573 , 1578 (Fed.Cir.1988).
green
Mag Instrument, Inc. v. The United States International Trade Commission, Kassnar Imports, Inc. Brinkmann Cor… (1989)
Sec. 210.54(a)(2) (1988) (any issue not raised in the petition for review of the initial determination will be deemed to have been abandoned); see Allied Corp. v. U.S. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 850 F.2d 1573 , 1580, 7 USPQ2d 1303, 1308 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 109 S.Ct. 791 (1989)