Marshall v. Reams (1893)

green · 35 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 5

Treatment trajectory · 1909 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

190919672026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green AA v. Department of Children and Families (2005)

Quote Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Marshall v. Reams, 32 Fla. 499 , 14 So. 95 , 97 (1893) ("We do not desire to be understood as denying the right of a parent, or one standing in loco parentis, to moderately chastise for correction a child under his or her control and authority ...."); see also Raford v. State, 828 So.2d 1012 , 1021 n. 5 (Fla.2002) ("It appears that the common law recognized a parent's right to discipline his or her child in a `reasonable manner.'") (citation omitted).

"We do not desire to be understood as denying the right of a parent, or one standing in loco parentis, to moderately chastise for correction a child under his or her control and authority ...."

green Wilson v. State (1999)

Quote Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

"We do not desire to be understood as denying the right of a parent, or one standing in loco parentis, to moderately chastise for correction a child under his or her control and authority...."

green Kama v. State (1987)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Marshall v. Reams, 32 Fla. 499 , 14 So. 95 , 97 (1893).

green Raford v. State (2002)

Cited · Fla. · signal: see

See Marshall v. Reams, 32 Fla. 499 , 14 So. 95 , 97 (1893) (recognizing the "right of a parent, or one standing in loco parentis, to moderately chastise for correction a child under his or her control and authority").

recognizing the "right of a parent, or one standing in loco parentis, to moderately chastise for correction a child under his or her control and authority"

green REED BY & THROUGH LAWRENCE v. Bowen (1986)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Marshall v. Reams, 32 Fla. 499 , 14 So. 95 (1893); see also, Epperson v. Epperson, 101 So.2d 367 (Fla. 1958); 26 Fla.Jur.2d Family Law § 524 (1981).