How cited: Half Moon Bay Fishermen's Marketing Association v. Carlucci · Go Syfert

Half Moon Bay Fishermen's Marketing Association v. Carlucci (1988)

green · 108 citation events across 26 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198820072026
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 508 (9th Cir. 1988) (“[A] reasonably thorough discussion of the significant aspects of the probable environmental consequences” satisfies NEPA. (citation omitted)).
“[A] reasonably thorough discussion of the significant aspects of the probable environmental consequences” satisfies NEPA. (citation omitted)
Rule Authority · 1st Cir.
Ass'n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 510 (9th Cir. 1988), on which plaintiffs rely, is plainly distinguishable.
green Onda v. Jeff Rose (2019)
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 510 (9th Cir. 1988)).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 510 (9th Cir. 1988).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 510 (9th Cir. 1988).
green Onda v. Sally Jewell (2016)
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Half Moon Bay Fisherman’s Marketing Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 510 (9th Cir. 1988).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Half Moon Bay Fisherman’s Marketing Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 510 (9th Cir. 1988).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Half Moon Bay Fishermans’ Marketing Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 510 (9th Cir. 1988).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
See 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A); Ariz. Cattle Growers’ Ass’n v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 273 F.3d 1229, 1235-36 (9th Cir.2001); Half Moon Bay Fishermans’ Marketing Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 508 (9th Cir.1988).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
See 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A); Ariz. Cattle Growers’Ass’n v. U. S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 273 F.3d 1229, 1235-36 (9th Cir.2001); Half Moon Bay Fishermans’ Marketing Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 508 (9th Cir.1988).
green St NV v. DOE (2006)
Quote Authority · D.C. Cir.
Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 508 (9th Cir. 1988) (“The reviewing court may not ‘flyspeck’ an EIS.”).
“The reviewing court may not ‘flyspeck’ an EIS.”
Rule Authority · D.C. Cir.
Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 508 (9th Cir.1988) (“The reviewing court may not ‘flyspeck’ an EIS.”).
Rule Authority · 4th Cir.
Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 508 (9th Cir.1988) (“The reviewing court may not ‘flyspeck’ an EIS.”).
Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.
Ass'n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 510 (9th Cir. 1988); see also Council on Environmental Quality, Considering Cumulative Effects under the National Environmental Policy Act (visited May 11, 1999) ("The concept of a baseline against which to compare predictions of the effects of the proposed action and reasonable alternatives is critical to the NEPA process.") 16 We acknowledge the debate over the propriety, under Chevron, of venturing beyond plain meaning analysis and resorti…
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
P. 8(a); Classic Components Supply, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc., 841 F.2d 163 (7th Cir.1988); Chemical Weapons Working Group v. Department of the Army, 101 F.3d 1360 (10th Cir.1996); Half Moon Bay Fishermans’ Marketing Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 506 (9th Cir.1988).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Ass'n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 508 (9th Cir.1988) (quotation omitted).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 508 (9th Cir.1988) (quotation omitted).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Half Moon Bay Fishermans' Marketing Ass'n. v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 507 (9th Cir.1988) 7 Kleenwell's broad interpretation of the Buck line of cases is also undercut by the Buck decision itself.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Half Moon Bay Fishermans’ Marketing Ass’n. v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 507 (9th Cir.1988). .
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Half Moon Bay Fisherman's Marketing Ass'n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 507 (9th Cir.1988).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Half Moon Bay Fisherman’s Marketing Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 507 (9th Cir.1988).
Rule Authority · D. Or. · 2 citations in this opinion
Ass'n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 510 (9th Cir. 1988)).
green Wright v. Inman (1996)
Rule Authority · D. Nev. · 2 citations in this opinion
“NEPA is essentially a procedural statute.” Half Moon Bay Fishermans’ Marketing Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 508 (9th Cir.1988) (internal quotation omitted).
Rule Authority · D. Haw. · 2 citations in this opinion
“If the balance of harm tips decidedly toward the plaintiff, then the plaintiff need not show as robust a likelihood of success on the merits as when the balance tips less decidedly.” Half Moon, 857 F.2d at 507.
Rule Authority · D. Idaho
Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 508 (9th Cir. 1988) (explaining a court should not be overly myopic in its review of the record, but rather make a “pragmatic judgment” about the form, content, and preparation of any documents to ensure they allow for informed decision-making and public participation).
explaining a court should not be overly myopic in its review of the record, but rather make a “pragmatic judgment” about the form, content, and preparation of any documents to ensure they allow for informed decision-making and public participation
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Ass'n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 510 (9th Cir. 1988)).
Rule Authority · D. Mont.
(CFEIS, 136, 479.) This information provided the Forest Service with sufficient information re garding big game to make a “reasoned decision.” Half Moon Bay, 857 F.2d at 508.
Rule Authority · D. Ariz.
A court should apply a “rule of reason” and determine only whether the EIS “contains a reasonably thorough discussion of the significant aspects of the probable environmental consequences.” Half Moon Bay Fishermans’ Marketing Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 508 (9th Cir.1988); see Or.
Rule Authority · Wash. Ct. App.
Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 510 (9th Cir. 1988)).
Rule Authority · Wash. Ct. App.
Ass'n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 510 (9th Cir.1988)). [9] The court stayed the public lands act claim pending resolution of this appeal. [10] Stempel v. Dep't of Water Res., 82 Wash.2d 109, 117 , 508 P.2d 166 (1973). [11] Id. [12] Id. at 118 , 508 P.2d 166 (quoting RCW 43.21C.030(2)(b)). [13] RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). [14] Norway Hill Preserv. & Prot.
Rule Authority · W.D. Wash.
Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 510 (9th Cir.1988) (discussing the importance of establishing baseline conditions in order to determine what effect the proposed action would have on the environment).
Rule Authority · N.D. Cal.
Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 510 (9th Cir.1988)).
Rule Authority · D.D.C.
Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 510 (9th Cir.1988) and referencing Final Report for the Atlantic Rim Mule Deer Study, Apr. 2007 (AR 7421).) Again, I disagree.
Rule Authority · D. Nev.
“This review requires the district court to make a ‘pragmatic judgment whether the EIS’s form, content, and preparation foster both informed decision-making and informed public participation.” Half Moon Bay Fishermans’ Marketing Assoc. v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 508 (9th Cir.1988) (quoting California v. Block, 690 F.2d 753, 761 (9th Cir.1982)).
Rule Authority · D. Nev.
Half Moon Bay Fishermans’ Marketing Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 510 (9th Cir.1988).
green Gaule v. Meade (2005)
Rule Authority · D. Alaska
Id. at 510. 90 .
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 512-14 (9th Cir.1988); Southwest Williamson County Cmty. Ass'n Inc. v. Slater, 67 F.Supp.2d 875, 885-86 (M.D.Tenn.1999); Texas v. United States Forest Serv., 654 F.Supp. 289, 295 (S.D.Tex.1986). 22 .
Rule Authority · E.D. Wash.
Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 507 (9th Cir.1988); Native Vill. of Quinhagak v. United States, 35 F.3d 388 , 392 (9th Cir.1994).
Rule Authority · W.D. Va.
Cf. Jersey Heights Neigh borhood Ass’n v. Glendening, 174 F.3d 180, 187 (4th Cir.1999) (noting in the statute-of-limitations context that “designation of the ROD as final agency action under the APA is generally recognized.”); Half Moon Bay Fishermans’ Marketing Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 512 (9th Cir.1988) (holding in a context analogous to the case at bar that the defendant Corps of Engineers’s record of decision represented “their final decision”).
Rule Authority · W.D. Mich.
Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 508 (9th Cir.1988)).
Rule Authority · M.D.N.C.
Half Moon Bay Fishermans’ Marketing Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 508 (9th Cir. 1988).
Rule Authority · D. Mont.
Ass’n, 857 F.2d 505, 508 (9th Cir.1988).
Rule Authority · N.D. Cal.
Ass’n. v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 507 (9th Cir.1988).
green Uarco Inc. v. Lam (1998)
Rule Authority · D. Haw.
Court For Central Dist. of California, 650 F.2d 1004 , 1008 (9th Cir.1981) (standard for preliminary injunction is at least as strict as that for a TRO) (Ferguson, J., dissenting); Half Moon Bay Fishermans’ Marketing Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 507 (9th Cir.1988) (district court denied motion for TRO which was treated by stipulation as also a motion for preliminary injunction).
Rule Authority
Ass'n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 508-09 (9th Cir.1988) (quotation omitted). 82 We agree with BPA that it was not necessary to include an analysis of the Fish and Wildlife Agreement in the EA or to allow public comment on the Agreement.
Rule Authority
Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 508-09 (9th Cir.1988) (quotation omitted).
Rule Authority · D. Haw.
Court For Central Dist. of California, 650 F.2d 1004 , 1008 (9th Cir.1981) (standard for preliminary injunction is at least as strict as that for TRO) (Ferguson, J., dissenting); Half Moon Bay Fishermans’ Marketing Ass’n v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 507 (9th Cir.1988) (district court denied motion for TRO which was treated by stipulation as also a motion for preliminary injunction).
Rule Authority · D. Or.
William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. ITT Continental Baking Co., 526 F.2d 86, 88 (9th Cir.1975); United States v. Odessa Union Warehouse Co-op, 833 F.2d 172, 174 (9th Cir.1987); Half Moon Bay Fishermans’ Marketing Asso. v. Carlucci, 857 F.2d 505, 507 (9th Cir.1988); Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Christie, 812 F.2d 1097, 1102 (9th Cir.1986).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion
See id. at 512 . 22 The Forest Service asserts that our decision in Half Moon Bay demonstrates that an inadequate EIS may be supplemented by a procedure other than a supplemental EA or EIS.
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion
See id. at 512 .