Smolsky v. Pennsylvania General Assembly (2011)
green
· 23 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 3 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201220192026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
William Penn SD v. PA Department of Education (2020)
Assembly, 34 A.3d 316, 321 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2011).
green
L.C. Velez v. J.E. Wetzel, Sec. of Corr' (2024)
Id.; see Smolsky v. Pennsylvania General Assembly, 34 A.3d 316 , 321 n.7 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2011) (holding that courts have ruled on POs raising sovereign immunity where a petitioner did not object to improper procedure). 6 Section 8522 of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa. C.S. §8522; La Frankie v. Miklich, 618 A.2d 1145, 1149 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1992).
holding that courts have ruled on POs raising sovereign immunity where a petitioner did not object to improper procedure
green
W. Thomas v. K. Smith, Major of Security at DOC (2023)
Id.; see Smolsky v. Pennsylvania General Assembly, 34 A.3d 316 , 321 n.7 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2011) (holding that courts have ruled on POs raising sovereign immunity where a petitioner did not object to improper procedure). 10 plain reading of his assertions reveal that he only alleges intentional acts.3 Specifically, Inmate alleges that Respondents committed “willful misconduct” by acting “in collusion and conspiracy” with each other to adopt a new policy which is carried out by th…
holding that courts have ruled on POs raising sovereign immunity where a petitioner did not object to improper procedure