Cluster 518466 (1989)
green
· 36 citation events
across 8 courts.
Showing the 15 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198920072026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
The Jacobs Manufacturing Company v. Sam Brown Co. (1994)
Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1142 (8th Cir.1989); Essex, 661 S.W.2d at 551 .
Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1142 (8th Cir.1989).
green
Continental Assurance Company v. Cedar Rapids Pediatric Clinic v. Cedar Rapids Pediatric Clinic Employees Pen… (1992)
Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1142 (8th Cir.1989).
green
Charles B. Nancarrow v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (1991)
“The granting of a motion [for directed verdict or] for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is appropriate ‘only if the evidence points all one way and is susceptible of no reasonable inferences sustaining the position of the nonmoving party.’ ” Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1142 (8th Cir.1989) (citation omitted); see Dace v. ACF Industries, Inc., 722 F.2d 374, 375-76 (8th Cir.1983).
“The granting of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is appropriate ‘only if the evidence points all one way and is susceptible of no reasonable inferences sustaining the position of the nonmoving party.’ ” Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1142 (8th Cir.1989) (citation omitted); see Dace v. ACF Industries, Inc., 722 F.2d 374, 375-76 (8th Cir.1983).
green
Jane Hauser v. Michael J. Kubalak (1991)
“The granting of a motion [for directed verdict or] for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is appropriate ‘only if the evidence points all one way and is susceptible of no reasonable inferences sustaining the position of the nonmoving party.’ ” Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1142 (8th Cir.1989) (citation omitted); see Dace v. ACF Industries, Inc., 722 F.2d 374, 375-76 (8th Cir.1983).
Although a party alleging fraud under Missouri law may establish each element with circumstantial evidence, that proof must rest on “something more substantial than suspicion, surmise, and speculation.” Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1142 (8th Cir.1989). “[A] party’s case will fail if he can show only facts and circumstances which are equally consistent with honesty and good faith.” Craft, 766 F.2d at 1218 .
green
Wernes v. Kroesen (2020)
Since the Bankruptcy Court found against them on the damages issue without considering whether the ‘out of pocket’ measure of damages is applicable, we reverse and remand.” Id. at 725 (citing Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1143 (8th Cir.1989); Central Microfilm Serv. v. Basic/Four Corp., 688 F.2d 1206 , 1220(8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 (1983)).
green
Kroesen v. Wernes (2020)
Since the Bankruptcy Court found against them on the damages issue without considering whether the ‘out of pocket’ measure of damages is applicable, we reverse and remand.” Id. at 725 (citing Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1143 (8th Cir.1989); Central Microfilm Serv. v. Basic/Four Corp., 688 F.2d 1206 , 1220(8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 (1983)).
green
Wells v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. (2013)
Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1143 (8th Cir.1989) (citing Central Microfilm, 688 F.2d at 1220 ); Kerr v. First Commodity Corp., 735 F.2d 281, 285 (8th Cir.1984).
green
Bauer v. Gilmartin (In Re Gilmartin) (2011)
Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1143 (8th Cir.1989). 13 .
green
Larry M. Bauer v. James J. Gilmartin (2011)
However, the Court did not discuss this as part of its analysis of the resulting damage element. 12 Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1143 (8th Cir. 1989). 13 Id.
green
B & B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc. (2010)
The grant of judgment as a matter of law “is appropriate ‘only if the evidence points all one way and is susceptible of no reasonable inferences sustaining the position of the non-moving party.’ ” Hauser v. Kubalak, 929 F.2d 1305, 1307 (8th Cir.l991)(quoting Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1142 (8th Cir.1989) (citation omitted)).
green
Fielder v. Credit Acceptance Corp. (1998)
Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1142 (8th Cir.1989).
See, e.g., Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1144 (8th Cir.1989) (“Legal malice for purposes of imposition of punitive damages arises when there is intentional doing of a wrongful act without just cause or excuse.”); Composite Marine Propellers v. Van Der Woude, 962 F.2d 1263, 1268 (7th Cir.1992) (reversing punitive award and noting the “uncharitable” and “unforgiving” nature of competition).