How cited: Cluster 518466 · Go Syfert

Cluster 518466 (1989)

green · 36 citation events across 8 courts. Showing the 15 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198920072026
Rule Authority · 8th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1142 (8th Cir.1989); Essex, 661 S.W.2d at 551 .
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1142 (8th Cir.1989).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1142 (8th Cir.1989).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
“The granting of a motion [for directed verdict or] for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is appropriate ‘only if the evidence points all one way and is susceptible of no reasonable inferences sustaining the position of the nonmoving party.’ ” Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1142 (8th Cir.1989) (citation omitted); see Dace v. ACF Industries, Inc., 722 F.2d 374, 375-76 (8th Cir.1983).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
“The granting of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is appropriate ‘only if the evidence points all one way and is susceptible of no reasonable inferences sustaining the position of the nonmoving party.’ ” Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1142 (8th Cir.1989) (citation omitted); see Dace v. ACF Industries, Inc., 722 F.2d 374, 375-76 (8th Cir.1983).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
“The granting of a motion [for directed verdict or] for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is appropriate ‘only if the evidence points all one way and is susceptible of no reasonable inferences sustaining the position of the nonmoving party.’ ” Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1142 (8th Cir.1989) (citation omitted); see Dace v. ACF Industries, Inc., 722 F.2d 374, 375-76 (8th Cir.1983).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Although a party alleging fraud under Missouri law may establish each element with circumstantial evidence, that proof must rest on “something more substantial than suspicion, surmise, and speculation.” Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1142 (8th Cir.1989). “[A] party’s case will fail if he can show only facts and circumstances which are equally consistent with honesty and good faith.” Craft, 766 F.2d at 1218 .
green Wernes v. Kroesen (2020)
Rule Authority · Bankr. W.D. Mo. · 3 citations in this opinion
Since the Bankruptcy Court found against them on the damages issue without considering whether the ‘out of pocket’ measure of damages is applicable, we reverse and remand.” Id. at 725 (citing Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1143 (8th Cir.1989); Central Microfilm Serv. v. Basic/Four Corp., 688 F.2d 1206 , 1220(8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 (1983)).
green Kroesen v. Wernes (2020)
Rule Authority · Bankr. W.D. Mo. · 3 citations in this opinion
Since the Bankruptcy Court found against them on the damages issue without considering whether the ‘out of pocket’ measure of damages is applicable, we reverse and remand.” Id. at 725 (citing Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1143 (8th Cir.1989); Central Microfilm Serv. v. Basic/Four Corp., 688 F.2d 1206 , 1220(8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 (1983)).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1143 (8th Cir.1989) (citing Central Microfilm, 688 F.2d at 1220 ); Kerr v. First Commodity Corp., 735 F.2d 281, 285 (8th Cir.1984).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir. BAP
Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1143 (8th Cir.1989). 13 .
Rule Authority · 8th Cir. BAP
However, the Court did not discuss this as part of its analysis of the resulting damage element. 12 Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1143 (8th Cir. 1989). 13 Id.
Rule Authority · E.D. Ark.
The grant of judgment as a matter of law “is appropriate ‘only if the evidence points all one way and is susceptible of no reasonable inferences sustaining the position of the non-moving party.’ ” Hauser v. Kubalak, 929 F.2d 1305, 1307 (8th Cir.l991)(quoting Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1142 (8th Cir.1989) (citation omitted)).
Rule Authority · W.D. Mo.
Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1142 (8th Cir.1989).
Cited (see also) · D. Maryland · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Glass Design Imports, Inc. v. Import Specialties, 867 F.2d 1139, 1144 (8th Cir.1989) (“Legal malice for purposes of imposition of punitive damages arises when there is intentional doing of a wrongful act without just cause or excuse.”); Composite Marine Propellers v. Van Der Woude, 962 F.2d 1263, 1268 (7th Cir.1992) (reversing punitive award and noting the “uncharitable” and “unforgiving” nature of competition).