Dirt & Rock Rentals, Inc. v. Irwin & Powell Construction, Inc. (1992)
green
· 13 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 4 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
Ascent/Corporex argue that an insolvent contractor is also the reason our Court of Appeals approved a potential unjust enrichment recovery by a ' subcontractor against a property owner. in Dirt & Rock Rentals, Inc. v. Irwin & Powell Constr., Inc., 838 S.W.2d 412, 414 (Ky. App. 1992), but the opinion · makes no reference to the solvency of the contractor.
Ascent/Corporex argue that an insolvent contractor is also the reason our Court of Appeals approved a potential unjust enrichment recovery by a ' subcontractor against a property owner. in Dirt & Rock Rentals, Inc. v. Irwin & Powell Constr., Inc., 838 S.W.2d 412, 414 (Ky. App. 1992), but the opinion · makes no reference to the solvency of the contractor.
Ascent/Corporex argue that an insolvent contractor is also the reason our Court of Appeals approved a potential unjust enrichment recovery by a ' subcontractor against a property owner. in Dirt & Rock Rentals, Inc. v. Irwin & Powell Constr., Inc., 838 S.W.2d 412, 414 (Ky. App. 1992), but the opinion · makes no reference to the solvency of the contractor.
green
Brock v. Pilot Corp. (2007)
Dirt & Rock Rentals v. Irwin & Powell Const, 838 S.W.2d 412, 414 (Ky.App.1992); Guarantee Electric Co. v. Big Rivers Electric Corp., 669 F.Supp. 1371, 1381 (W.D.Ky.1987).