How cited: LOFTHOUSE (JASON) VS. STATE · Go Syfert

LOFTHOUSE (JASON) VS. STATE (2020)

green · 16 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · Nev. · 3 citations in this opinion
Lofthouse, 136 Nev. at 380, 467 P.3d at 611. 2This is not to minimize the potential detrimental effect of losing ones vehicle after making repeated payments on an over-secured loan, see, e.g., Jessie Lundberg, Big Interest Rates Under the Big Sky: The Case for Payday and Title Lending Reform in Montana, 68 Mont.
Rule Authority · Nev. · signal: cf. · 2 citations in this opinion
See Nevada Department of Corrections Glossary, 24 (last updated 09/11/2020) (defining “Offender” as “[a]n individual convicted or adjudicated of a criminal offense”); cf. Lofthouse v. State, 136 Nev. 378, 380, 467 P.3d 609, 611 (2020) (noting that the court gives statutory words “their plain and ordinary meanings unless the context requires a technical meaning or a different meaning is apparent from the context’).
noting that the court gives statutory words “their plain and ordinary meanings unless the context requires a technical meaning or a different meaning is apparent from the context’
Rule Authority · Nev. · 2 citations in this opinion
Moore v. State, 136 Nev. 620, 622-23, 475 P.3d 33, 36 (2020); Lofthouse v. State, 136 Nev. 378, 380, 467 P.3d 609, 611 (2020).
green Boyd (Keair) v. State (2022)
Rule Authority · Nev. · 2 citations in this opinion
Lofthouse v. State, 136 Nev. 378 , 380-81, 467 P.3d 609, 612 (2020) (observing that first-degree kidnapping requires the intent to commit the predicate offense and analyzing what constitutes an "unlawful act" under the list of predicate offenses).
observing that first-degree kidnapping requires the intent to commit the predicate offense and analyzing what constitutes an "unlawful act" under the list of predicate offenses
Rule Authority · Nev.
In doing so, we begin with the statute's text, Kassebaurn v. State, Dep't of Corr., 139 Nev. 311 , 314, 535 P.3d 651 , 655 (2023), assigning words their "plain and ordinary meanings," Lofthouse v. State, 136 Nev. 378 , 380, 467 P.3d 609, 611 (2020).
Rule Authority · Nev.
Lofthouse State, 136 Nev. 378 , 380, 467 P.3d 609, 611 (2020) (explaining that "context and structure [may] inform which of [multiple plain and ordinary] meanings applies"); see also S. Nev.
explaining that "context and structure [may] inform which of [multiple plain and ordinary] meanings applies"
Rule Authority · Nev.
State, 136 Nev, 378, 380, 467 P.3d 609, 611 (2020), and we interpret statutes "in light of the policy and spirit of the law," Flamingo Paradise, 125 Nev. at 509 , 217 P.3d at 551 . "[V] agueness analysis does not treat statutory text as a closed universe." Castaneda, 126 Nev. at 483 , 245 P.3d at 553 .
Rule Authority · Nev.
Op. 44 , 467 P.3d 609, 612 (2020) (providing that NRS 200.310(1) "requires the intent to commit a predicate offense); Catanio, 120 Nev. at 1033-34 , 102 P.3d at 591 (providing that, under NRS 201.230, "[a]n act committed 'with the minor's body indicates that the minor's body is the object of attention, and that language SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 4 (0) 1947A me*, does not require a physical touching by the accused"); see also Sharma v. State, 118 Nev. 648, 659 , 56 P.3d 868, 87
providing that NRS 200.310(1) "requires the intent to commit a predicate offense