Riverview Investments, Inc. v. Ottawa Community Improvement Corporation (1990)
green
· 93 citation events
across 16 courts.
Showing the 18 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199020082026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
Id. at 485 (emphasis in original).
emphasis in original
green
Michigan Paytel Joint Venture v. City of Detroit (2002)
Riverview Invs., Inc. v. Ottawa Cmty. Improvement Corp., 899 F.2d 474, 478-79 (6th Cir.1990) (“Riverview III”).
green
Michigan Paytel Joint Venture v. City Of Detroit (2002)
Riverview Invs., Inc. v. Ottawa Cmty. Improvement Corp., 899 F.2d 474, 478-79 (6th Cir.1990) (" Riverview III ").
green
Szmaj, George S. v. AT&T (2002)
See Giles v. General Electric Co., 245 F.3d 474 , 481- 83 (5th Cir. 2001); Taylor Publishing Co. v. Jostens, Inc., 216 F.3d 465, 472-73 (5th Cir. 2000); Pahuta v. Massey- Ferguson, Inc., 170 F.3d 125, 129 (2d Cir. 1999); Alcatel USA Inc. v. DGI Technologies, Inc., 166 F.3d 772, 781 (5th Cir. 1999); Singer v. Dungan, 45 F.3d 823, 829 (4th Cir. 1995); Keisling v. Ser-Jobs for Progress, Inc., 19 F.3d 755, 759 (1st Cir. 1994); Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp., 4 F.3d 1153, 11…
green
Sancap Abrasives Corp. v. Swiss Industrial Abrasives (2001)
Riverview Investments, Inc. v. Ottawa Community Improvement Corp., 899 F.2d 474, 483 (6th Cir.1990).
green
Cason-Merenda v. Detroit Medical Center (2012)
In the wake of this Supreme Court precedent, the Sixth Circuit has adopted a “two-part inquiry for evaluating the propriety of summary judgment in an antitrust conspiracy case.” Riverview Investments, Inc. v. Ottawa Community Improvement Corp., 899 F.2d 474, 483 (6th Cir.1990) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also In re Northwest Airlines, 208 F.R.D. at 195 .
green
Re/Max International, Inc. v. Realty One, Inc. (1996)
However, those factors, in the context of the case, did not tend to exclude the possibility of independent conduct: “All may be consistent with conspiratorial conduct but ... proving that conduct is consistent with a conspiracy is not sufficient to allow an inference of conspiracy absent some evidence which tends to exclude the possibility that conduct is independent.” Riverview, 899 F.2d at 485 (emphasis in original).
emphasis in original
green
Alakayak v. British Columbia Packers, Ltd. (2002)
AD/SAT v. Associated Press, 181 F.3d 216, 233 (2d Cir.1999) (quoting Matsushita, 475 U.S. at 588 , 106 S.Ct. 1348 ); see also Ideal Dairy Farms, Inc. v. John Labatt, Ltd., 90 F.3d 737 , 748 (3d Cir.1996); Market Force Inc. v. Wauwatosa Realty Co., 906 F.2d 1167, 1171 (7th Cir.1990); Riverview Investments, Inc. v. Ottawa Community Improvement Corp., 899 F.2d 474, 483 (6th Cir. 1990); Dreiling v. Peugeot Motors of America, Inc., 850 F.2d 1373, 1379 (10th Cir.1988). 71 .
green
Weber v. National Football League (2000)
The Sixth Circuit has ruled that conspiracy may not be inferred under the Sherman Act “if there is no economic motive to conspire and there is non-conspiratorial explanation for alleged conspiratorial conduct.” River-view Investments, Inc. v. Ottawa Community Improvement Corporation, 899 F.2d 474, 483 (6th Cir.1990).
green
Northeastern Educational Television of Ohio, Inc. v. Educational Television Assoc. of Metropolitan Cleveland (1990)
Riverview Investments, Inc. v. Ottawa Community Improvement Corp., 899 F.2d 474, 483 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 151 , 112 L.Ed.2d 117 (1990) (citing Gibson v. Greater Park City Co., 818 F.2d 722, 724 (10th Cir.1987)).
green
Perceptron, Incorporated, a Michigan Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Sensor Adaptive MacHines Incorporated… (2000)
See Riverview Investments, Inc. v. Ottawa Comm. Improvement Corp., 899 F.2d 474 , 477 (6th Cir. 1990); Boynton v. TRW, Inc., 858 F.2d 1178, 1185-86 (6th Cir. 1988) (en banc).
green
Perceptron, Inc. v. Sensor Adaptive Machines, Inc. (2000)
See Riverview Investments, Inc. v. Ottawa Comm. Improvement Corp., 899 F.2d 474 , 477 (6th Cir.1990); Boynton v. TRW, Inc., 858 F.2d 1178, 1185-86 (6th Cir.1988) (en banc).
green
Market Force Inc. v. Wauwatosa Realty Co. (1990)
See Riverview Invs., Inc. v. Ottawa Community Improvement Corp., 899 F.2d 474 , 484 (6th Cir.1990); Bolt v. Halifax Hosp.
See Riverview Invs., Inc. v. Ottawa Community Improvement Corp., 899 F.2d 474 , 484 (6th Cir.1990); Bolt v. Halifax Hosp.
green
Re/Max International, Inc. v. Realty One, Inc. (1999)
See Riverview Investments, Inc. v. Ottawa Community Improvement Corp., 899 F.2d 474, 483 (6th Cir.1990).
green
Re/Max International, Inc. v. Realty One, Inc. (1999)
See Riverview Investments, Inc. v. Ottawa Community Improvement Corp., 899 F.2d 474, 483 (6th Cir.1990).
Finally, Plaintiffs have also failed to provide “plausible grounds to infer an agreement.” Twombly, 127 S.Ct. at 1965 (“Asking for plausible grounds to infer an agreement does not impose a probability requirement at the pleading stage; it simply calls for enough fact to raise a reasonable expectation that discovery will reveal evidence of illegal agreement.”); see also Riverview Investments, Inc. v. Ottawa Community Improvement Corp., 899 F.2d 474, 483 (6th Cir.1990) (explai…
green
In re Northwest Airlines Corp. (2002)
See Riverview Investments, Inc. v. Ottawa Community Improvement Corp., 899 F.2d 474, 483 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 498 U.S. 855 , 111 S.Ct. 151 , 112 L.Ed.2d 117 (1990).