Cluster 541811 (1990)
green
· 412 citation events
across 25 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199020082026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
21 Employee Benefits Cas. 1853, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6489, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,613, Pens. Plan Guid… (1997)
Id. at 711-12.
green
Crotty v. Cook (1997)
Id. at 711-12.
green
McBride v. PLM International, Inc. (1999)
Cf. Nishimoto, 903 F.2d at 714 (“former employees whose vested benefits under a plan have already been distributed in a lump sum at the time they file suit are not ‘participants’ within the meaning of [29 U.S.C.] § 1002(7)”); Kuntz, 785 F.2d at 1411 (claimants who have received full extent of vested benefits under ERISA plan prior to filing suit lack standing as “participants”); Raymond v. Mobil Oil Corp., 983 F.2d 1528, 1536 (10th Cir.1993) (same).
green
Crawford v. Lamantia (1994)
The court noted that Nishimoto's “receipt of all the benefits she was due under the plan indicates ... that the ERISA claim might have become subject to dismissal at that point.” Id. at 715.
green
Crawford v. Lamantia (1994)
The court noted that Nishimoto's "receipt of all the benefits she was due under the plan indicates . . . that the ERISA claim might have become subject to dismissal at that point." Id. at 715.
See Olson v. General Dynamics Corp., 960 F.2d 1418, 1422 (9th Cir.1991) (holding that participant status determined at the time of filing the suit), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 2968 , 119 L.Ed.2d 588 (1992); Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Associates, 903 F.2d 709, 714 (9th Cir.1990).
green
Harris v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance (1994)
See Olson v. General Dynamics Corp., 960 F.2d 1418, 1422 (9th Cir.1991) (holding that participant status determined at the time of filing the suit), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 2968 , 119 L.Ed.2d 588 (1992); Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Associates, 903 F.2d 709, 714 (9th Cir.1990).
Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Associates, 903 F.2d 709, 712 (9th Cir.1990); Fuller v. M.G.
green
Charles Michael Martin v. State of Arizona Department of Corrections, Defendants-Apellees (1995)
See id. at 1984 ; Nishimoto, 903 F.2d at 712. 23 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for submission on the record and briefs and without oral argument.
green
Ervin Charles St. Amand v. Francis Smith, Lt., Individually and Officially John Campbell Dwaine Roberson and … (1994)
Nishimoto, 903 F.2d at 712. 14 St.
In the Opposition, Defendants advance the conclusory position that the state law claims “are so related to the preempted claims that they emanate from, and form part of, the same ‘case or controversy,’ such that they should all be tried in one action.” Dkt. 11 at 27–28 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1367 (a); Nishimoto, 903 F.2d at 714).
Motors Acceptance Corp., 298 U.S. 15 178, 182–83 (1936)); Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assoc., 903 F.2d 709 , 712 n.3 16 (9th Cir. 1990) (“The burden of establishing federal jurisdiction is on the party seeking 17 removal, and the removal statute is strictly construed against removal jurisdiction.”). 18 “Federal jurisdiction must be rejected if there is any doubt as to the right of removal in 19 the first instance.” Gaus v. Miles, Inc., 980 F.2d 564, 566 (9th Cir. 1992).
“The burden of establishing federal jurisdiction is on the party seeking 17 removal, and the removal statute is strictly construed against removal jurisdiction.”
green
County of Santa Clara v. Wang (2020)
Shizuko Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 903 F.2d 709, 712 (9th Cir. 5 1990).
green
Millar v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District (2002)
Carnegie-Mellon, 484 U.S. at 350 , 108 S.Ct. 614 ; Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Associates, 903 F.2d 709, 715 (9th Cir.1990.) This longstanding rule is based on the policy that judicial economy, convenience, fairness and comity will sometimes best be served by the retention of jurisdiction by the federal court, particularly in instances where the trial date is imminent or where the federal court has performed a substantial amount of legal analysis that would need to be r…
green
Zenaida Walters v. \A\" Company (1995)
Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Associates, 903 F.2d 709, 712 (9th Cir.1990).
green
Nunez v. Monterey Peninsula Engineering (1994)
Co., 26 F.3d 930, 933 (9th Cir.1994); see also, Olson v. General Dynamics Corp., 960 F.2d 1418, 1422 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 2968 , 119 L.Ed.2d 588 (1992) (“At the time he filed his suit, Olson was receiving benefits [and] was therefore a ‘participant’ ”) [emphasis added]; Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Associates, 903 F.2d 709, 714 (9th Cir.1990) (“former employees whose vested benefits under a plan have already been distributed in a lump sum at …
green
Gary St. Hilaire v. Sam Lewis, Director (1994)
See Nishimoto, 903 F.2d at 712.
green
John Byron Cuffle v. John Avenenti, Deputy Warden Ted Jolly, Health Unit Director Rod Norrish, Health Unit Ad… (1994)
See Nishimoto, 903 F.2d at 712.
green
David Adams v. County of Los Angeles Charles B. Musgrave Lt. Thomas Ewens Gary E. Vance Dan Strasburg Deborah… (1996)
See Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 903 F.2d 709 , 712 (9th Cir.1990).
green
David Lee Daniel v. Frank Hall (1994)
See Nishimoto, 903 F.2d at 712.
green
Stern v. Farmers Insurance Group of Companies (2003)
See Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 903 F.2d 709 , 714 (9th Cir.1990).
green
Edward F. Cross v. The Aerospace Corp. (1997)
See id. at 715. 5 Here, Cross's state FEHA and ADEA claims arose from a common nucleus of operative facts: Cross's termination.
green
Kamal M.E. Mubarik v. David Brown, and Richard A. Walsh, Maricopa Medical Center Carlos Benevidez, Tempe Poli… (1995)
See Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 903 F.2d 709 , 712 (9th Cir.1990).
green
Willie R. Finley v. Samuel Lewis (1994)
See Nishimoto, 903 F.2d at 712. 8 Finley's challenge to the district court's treatment of his post-judgment motions also is without merit.
green
Ervin Charles St. Amand v. George Kaiser, Medical Director of Nevada D.O.P. Medical Division, in His Individu… (1994)
See Nishimoto, 903 F.2d at 712.
green
System 99 Minority Shareholders v. Alan W. Robison Bernie G. Head Bradley Lusk Golden Sanwa Bank (1992)
Credit Corp., 405 U.S. 699 (1972)); accord Nishimoto, 903 F.2d at 712-13.
green
Garrett v. Commonwealth Mortgage Corp. of America (1991)
See Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 903 F.2d 709 , 712 (9th Cir.1990) (issues of removal reviewable de novo ); Farmers-Merchants Bank & Trust Co. v. CIT Group/Equip.
green
Garrett v. Commonwealth Mortgage Corp. of America (1991)
See Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 903 F.2d 709 , 712 (9th Cir.1990) (issues of removal reviewable de novo); Farmers-Merchants Bank & Trust Co. v. CIT Group/Equip.
green
57 Fair empl.prac.cas. 209, 56 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,905 Don W. Felton Linda Felton, Husband and Wife v. The … (1991)
See Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assoc., 903 F.2d 709 (9th Cir.1990) (plaintiff's claim that she was terminated by employer to prevent her from acquiring a vested interest in a retirement plan was preempted by ERISA) and Sorosky v. Burroughs Corp., 826 F.2d 794 (9th Cir.1987) (wrongful termination claim based on theory that employer wanted to avoid paying retirement benefits was preempted by ERISA). 19 Any remaining doubts regarding ERISA preemption of wrongful terminati…
green
Felton v. Unisource Corp. (1991)
See Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assoc., 903 F.2d 709 (9th Cir.1990) (plaintiff’s claim that she was terminated by employer to prevent her from acquiring a vested interest in a retirement plan was preempted by ERISA) and Sorosky v. Burroughs Corp., 826 F.2d 794 (9th Cir.1987) (wrongful termination claim based on theory that employer wanted to avoid paying retirement benefits was preempted by ERISA).
green
Lovell v. Bad Ass Coffee Co. of Hawaii, Inc. (2000)
See Gaus v. Miles, Inc., 980 F.2d 564, 566 (9th Cir.1992) (citing Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 903 F.2d 709 , 712 n. 3 (9th Cir.1990)).
See Nishimoto, 903 F.2d at 714 .
green
Keshava LLC v. Goyens (2025)
See 28 U.S.C. § 1442 (a)–(c). 19 The burden is on the removing defendant to establish the basis for subject matter jurisdiction. 20 Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 903 F.2d 709 , 712 n.3 (9th Cir. 1990).
green
Theweny v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (2024)
See Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach Assocs., 903 F.2d 709 , 712 n. 3 (9th Cir. 2 1990). 3 Plaintiff asserts that Defendant cannot meet its burden in this case.
green
Watters v. Cannon (2023)
See 19 Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 903 F.2d 709 , 712 n.3 (9th Cir. 1990).
green
Morales v. Piche (2022)
See 20 Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 903 F.2d 709 , 712 n.3 (9th Cir. 1990).
green
Zuniga v. Safeway, Inc. (2021)
Carnegie–Mellon University v. Cohill, 484 25 U.S. 343, 349-50 (1988) (district court should “consider and weigh in each case, and at every stage 26 of the litigation, the values of judicial economy, convenience, fairness, and comity . . . ” in exercising discretionary pendent jurisdiction); accord Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 27 903 F.2d 709 , 715 (9th Cir. 1990); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c) (“[i]f at any time before final judgment it appears that the district…
green
Reliant - Woods Grove, L.P. v. of the Johnson-family (2020)
See 28 U.S.C. § 1442 (a)–(c). 22 The burden is on the removing defendant to establish the basis for subject matter jurisdiction. 23 Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 903 F.2d 709 , 712 n.3 (9th Cir. 1990).
green
Molodih v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (2020)
See Gaus, 980 F.2d at 566 (quoting Nishimoto, 903 F.2d at 712 n.3).
green
Jose Lozano v. John Doe 1 (2020)
See Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 903 F.2d 709 , 715 (9th Cir. 1990) (citing Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343 , 349- 50 (1988)). 1 Tf either party believes this order is dispositive, they must object within 14 days.
citing Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343 , 349- 50 (1988)
green
Nelson v. Krebbs, Sr. (2019)
See Gaus 17 ||v. Miles, Inc., 980 F.2d 564, 566 (9th Cir. 1992) (“The ‘strong presumption’ against 18 |/removal jurisdiction means that the defendant always has the burden of establishing that 19 ||removal is proper.’’) (citing Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 903 F.2d 709 , 20 n.3 (9th Cir. 1990)). 21 For these reasons, the Court REMANDS this action to the Superior Court of the 22 ||State of California, County of San Diego.
green
Nosie v. ASSOCIATION OF FLIGHT ATTENDANTS-CWA (2010)
See Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 903 F.2d 709 , 712 n. 3 (9th Cir.1990).
green
Rossetto v. Oaktree Capital Management, LLC (2009)
See Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 903 F.2d 709 , 712 n. 3 (9th Cir.1990).
green
Plute v. Roadway Package System, Inc. (2001)
See Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 903 F.2d 709 , 712 n. 3 (9th Cir.1990); Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co., 846 F.2d 1190, 1195 (9th Cir.1988).
green
Briano v. Conseco Life Insurance (2000)
See Nishimoto, 903 F.2d at 712 n. 3. 2 .
green
Scott v. City of Seattle (1999)
See Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assoc., 903 F.2d 709 , 715 (9th Cir.1990).
green
Abada v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (1999)
See Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 903 F.2d 709 , 712 n. 3 (9th Cir.1990).
green
Caron v. Charles E. Maxwell, P.C. (1999)
See Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 903 F.2d 709 , 715 (9th Cir.1990) (citing Bright v. Bechtel Petroleum, 780 F.2d 766 , 771 (9th Cir.1986)).
green
Matherly v. Las Vegas Valley Water District (1996)
Gaus v. Miles, Inc., 980 F.2d 564, 566 (9th Cir.1992); see Nishimoto, 903 F.2d at 712 n. 3 (removal statute is strictly construed against removal jurisdiction).
green
Jose v. M/V FIR GROVE (1990)
See Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assoc., 903 F.2d 709 , 715 (9th Cir.1990) (pendent jurisdiction properly exercised where state and federal claims both arose out of defendant’s decision to terminate employment).