How cited: In Re Betty Tomlan, Debtor. Ian Ledlin, Trustee v. United States · Go Syfert

In Re Betty Tomlan, Debtor. Ian Ledlin, Trustee v. United States (1990)

green · 54 citation events across 24 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199020082026
green Nichol v. Stass (1998)
Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see
See Lipscomb v. Simmons, 884 F.2d 1242 , 1247 (9th Cir. 1989), vacated & rehearing en banc granted, 907 F.2d 114 (9th Cir. 1990), rehearing, 962 F.2d 1374 , 1384 (9th Cir. 1992) {en banc) (“[t]he State’s obligation to ensure that children in its custody are able to exercise their constitutional rights is even greater than its responsibility toward prisoners”).
green In Re Osborne (1993)
Cited · Bankr. C.D. Cal. · signal: see
See Tomlan, 907 F.2d at 114 (9th Cir.1990) and Tomlan, 102 B.R. at 792 and 797.
9th Cir.1990
Cited · Bankr. D. Utah · signal: see
See Ledlin v. United States (In re Tomlan), 102 B.R. 790 (E.D.Wash. 1989), aff'd 907 F.2d 114 (9th Cir.1990).
Cited (see also) · E.D.N.Y · signal: see also
In re Mayville Feed & Grain, Inc., 123 B.R. 245, 246-47 (Bankr.E.D.Mich. 1991); see also In re Tomlan, 102 B.R. 790, 792-93 (E.D.Wash.1989), aff'd, 907 F.2d 114 (9th Cir.1990) (holding the IRS not entitled to priority status for an untimely filed claim); In re Kragness, 82 B.R. 553, 555 (Bankr.D.Or.1988) (subordinating a claim of the state as being untimely filed); In re Sems Music Co., 24 B.R. 376, 379 (Bankr.Tenn.1982) (disallowing an untimely filed claim, absent fraud, la…
Cited (see also) · D. Colo. · signal: see also
King 15th ed. 1992); see also Ledlin v. United States (In re Tomlan), 102 B.R. 790, 795-97 (E.D.Wash.1989), aff 'd, 907 F.2d 114 (9th Cir.1990); In re Ryan, 78 B.R. 175, 178 (Bankr.E.D.Tenn.1987).
green In re Vecchio (1991)
Cited · E.D.N.Y · signal: see
See In re Tomlan, 907 F.2d 114 (9th Cir.1990) (“[T]he IRS must timely file a proof of its unsecured claims in order to obtain priority status in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy.”) One basis for disallowing a creditor’s claim is the failure to file a proof of claim before the applicable bar date.
Cited · Bankr. E.D. Mich. · signal: see
See In re Tomlan, 907 F.2d 114 (9th Cir.1990) (“[T]he IRS must timely file a proof of its unsecured claims in order to obtain priority status in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy.”) One basis for disallowing a creditor’s claim is the failure to file a proof of claim before the applicable bar date.