Sangster v. Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure (2014)
green
· 11 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 5 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
G. Keith Gambrel v. Paul Croushore, in His Capacity as Next Friend of Each Sophia Villareal, a Minor and Spen… (2021)
Licensure, 454 S.W.3d 854, 858 (Ky. App. 2014) (citations omitted).
citations omitted
green
Nicholas Charles Breiner v. Jon Ledford (2021)
Likewise, “[t]he question of immunity is a matter of law which this Court reviews de novo.” Sangster v. Kentucky Bd. of Medical Licensure, 454 S.W.3d 854, 856 (Ky. App. 2014) (citations omitted).
citations omitted
green
Lanora Kay Reedy v. Jeremy S. Logsdon, Individually (2023)
Licensure, 454 S.W.3d 854, 860 (Ky. App. 2014) (citations omitted).
citations omitted
green
New Albany Main Street Properties, LLC D/B/A Port of Louisville v. R. Wayne Stratton, Cpa (2022)
See, e.g., Belcher v. Kentucky Parole Bd., 917 S.W.2d 584, 589 (Ky. App. 1996) (concluding that parole board officials perform quasi-judicial tasks that are functionally comparable to those of judges); Sangster v. Kentucky Bd. of Medical Licensure, 454 S.W.3d 854, 862 (Ky. App. 2014) (concluding that board members performed quasi-judicial functions); Compton v. Romans, 869 S.W.2d 24, 28 (Ky. 1993) (concluding that the chairman of the State Racing Commission was exercising qu…
concluding that board members performed quasi-judicial functions
green
Nave v. Feinberg (2017)
See Webster County Bd. of Educ. v. Franklin , 392 S.W.3d 431 , 434 (Ky. App. 2013) ("Because a trial court is not required to make factual findings when ruling on a motion to dismiss, the determination is purely a matter of law; consequently, the Court of Appeals reviews the decision of the trial court de novo. "); Sangster v. Kentucky Bd. of Medical Licensure , 454 S.W.3d 854 , 856 (Ky. App. 2014) ("The question of immunity is a matter of law which this Court reviews de nov…
"The question of immunity is a matter of law which this Court reviews de novo. "