Alltel Tennessee, Inc. v. Tennessee Public Service Commission (1990)
green
· 49 citation events
across 19 courts.
Showing the 9 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199020082026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Cavalier Telephone, LLC v. Virginia Electric and Power Company, D/B/A Dominion Virginia Power, Cavalier Telep… (2002)
Pierce, Jr., Administrative Law Treatise § 14.1, at 271 (3d ed.1994); Alltel, 913 F.2d at 309 ("The principal reasons for the doctrine of primary jurisdiction are to obtain the benefit of the expertise and experience of the administrative agencies and the desirable uniformity which occurs when a specialized agency decides certain administrative questions.").
"The principal reasons for the doctrine of primary jurisdiction are to obtain the benefit of the expertise and experience of the administrative agencies and the desirable uniformity which occurs when a specialized agency decides certain administrative questions."
See 2 Kenneth Culp Davis & Richard J. *323 Pierce, Jr., Administrative Law Treatise § 14.1, at 271 (3d ed.1994); Alltel, 913 F.2d at 309 ("The principal reasons for the doctrine of primary jurisdiction are to obtain the benefit of the expertise and experience of the administrative agencies and the desirable uniformity which occurs when a specialized agency decides certain administrative questions.”).
"The principal reasons for the doctrine of primary jurisdiction are to obtain the benefit of the expertise and experience of the administrative agencies and the desirable uniformity which occurs when a specialized agency decides certain administrative questions.”
Sec. 402 (a) sets forth the procedures to "enjoin, set aside, annul, or suspend" any order of the Commission 5 Other circuits including the Sixth Circuit in Alltel Tennessee, Inc. v. Tennessee Public Service Commission, 913 F.2d 305, 308 (6th Cir.1990), and the Seventh Circuit in Illinois Bell Telephone, Co. v. Illinois Commerce Commission, 740 F.2d 566, 571 (7th Cir.1984), support the Ninth Circuit approach.
green
Mallenbaum v. Adelphia Communications Corp. (1996)
Other circuits including the Sixth Circuit in Alltel Tennessee, Inc. v. Tennessee Public Service Commission, 913 F.2d 305, 308 (6th Cir.1990), and the Seventh Circuit in Illinois Bell Telephone, Co. v. Illinois Commerce Commission, 740 F.2d 566, 571 (7th Cir.1984), support the Ninth Circuit approach.
green
Kiefer v. Paging Network, Inc. (1999)
It will promote uniformity “which occurs when a specialized agency decides certain administrative questions.” Alltel Tennessee, 913 F.2d at 309.
green
Ellis v. Tribune TV Co. (2005)
First, as noted previously in this ruling, courts have adopted a broad construction of § 401(b) due to the “vital policies furthered by private enforcement of FCC rulemaking orders.” South Central Telephone Co., 744 F.2d at 1118; accord Alltel Tennessee, Inc., 913 F.2d at 308.
See Alltel Tennessee, 913 F.2d at 308; Hawaiian Tel.
green
Pickelman v. Michigan State Police (2000)
See Alltel Tennessee, Inc. v. Tennessee Public Service Commission, 913 F.2d 305, 308 (6th Cir.1990).
See Alltel, 913 F.2d at 309.