Carlos Soler v. Roger F. Scott, Warden, Fci-Safford, Az United States Bureau of Prisons U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service (1991)
green
· 123 citation events
across 22 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199120082026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Montoya v. United States (1994)
See 942 F.2d at 604-05 ("a petitioner who has ___ alleged a cause of action under the APA or the Mandamus Act need not rely upon an implied private right of action under any other statute"). -5- 5 F. Supp. 696, 697 (D.
"a petitioner who has ___ alleged a cause of action under the APA or the Mandamus Act need not rely upon an implied private right of action under any other statute"
The two statutes are, after all, merely different means of “compelling an agency to take action which by law it is required to take.” Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597, 605 (9th Cir.) vacated sub nom.
green
Jose Fabela Martinez v. W.C. Wells, Warden, and U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service (1992)
Soler alleged 9 "the INS has a long-standing policy of refusing to begin any deportation proceedings until after release from [Bureau of Prisons] custody[ ]".... 10 Soler further alleged that due to the INS' policy he will be forced to remain in prison beyond the expiration of his term while waiting for the INS to decide whether he should be deported: "By delaying actual [deportation] proceedings until after the incarceration for Petitioner's criminal conviction," Soler alle…
footnote added
green
Roberto M. Cervantes v. A.D. Moyer, District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, R.E. Hol… (1996)
Upon consideration of that statement, the briefs, and the record, the request for oral argument is denied and the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record 1 Cervantes asserts on appeal that he "relies entirely" upon the decision of the Ninth Circuit in Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597, 604-05 (9th Cir.1991), in which the court ruled that mandamus was appropriate and held that "a petitioner who has alleged a cause of action under the [Administrative Procedure Act] or the …
See Silveyra v. Moschorack, 989 F.2d 1012 , 1014 n. 1 (9th Cir.1993); cf. Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597, 605 (9th Cir.1991), vacated as moot sub nom.
green
Marcus Steve Galliano v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, and Clifton E. Floyd, Warden (1994)
See Silveyra v. Moschorak, 989 F.2d 1012, 1014-15 (9th Cir.1993); Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597, 603 (9th Cir.1991), vacated as moot sub nom Sivley v. Soler, 113 S.Ct. 454 (1992).
While this court has held that section 1252(i), calling for the institution of deportation proceedings "as expeditiously as possible after the date of conviction," permits an alien to bring an action to require commencement of a deportation proceeding, see Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597, 601 (9th Cir.1991), we have never held that a delay in commencement of deportation proceedings after a conviction is a defense to the deportation. 7 The petitioner attempts to invoke the princ…
green
Abreu v. United States (1992)
This does not mean an official’s conduct is unreviewable because the official’s responsibilities are in some respects discretionary.” Soler, 942 F.2d at 602 (citations omitted).
citations omitted
green
Fadare v. Reno (1993)
In Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597, 600 (9th Cir.1991), vacated as moot, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 454 , 121 L.Ed.2d 364 (1992), Judge Browning set out concisely the “single objective” that Congress sought to accomplish by the enactment of Section 701: Congress enacted Section 701 ... to require the INS to abandon its practice of postponing prisoner deportation hearings until after the expiration of a prisoner’s sentence.
green
Hasan Mohammed Albalwah v. Joseph B. Edlow; Kristi Noem; Kashyap Patel; and Pamela Bondi (2025)
Indeed, the duty of timeliness placed on Defendants, which Plaintiff seeks a writ of mandamus to enforce, arises out of the APA. [See #1 at ¶ 29] The APA and the Mandamus Act are “different means of ‘compelling an agency to take action which by law it is required to take.’” Hernandez-Avalos v. INS, 50 F.3d 842, 844 (10th Cir. 1996) (quoting Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597, 605 (9th Cir.)).
“Mandamus may not be used to instruct an official how to exercise discretion.” Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597, 602 (9th Cir.1991), vacated on other grounds, 506 U.S. 969 , 113 S.Ct. 454 , 121 L.Ed.2d 364 (1992).
Bennett, 520 U.S. at 163 , 117 S.Ct. 1154 (citing Association of Data Processing Service Orgs., Inc. v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150, 153 , 90 S.Ct. 827 , 25 L.Ed.2d 184 (1970)); see also, Churchill County, 150 F.3d at 1078 ; Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597, 605 (9th Cir.1991), vacated on other grounds, 506 U.S. 969 , 113 S.Ct. 454 , 121 L.Ed.2d 364 (1992) (stating that the zone of interests test “is not meant to be especially demanding”).
green
Defenders of Wildlife v. Browner (1995)
Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597, 603 (9th Cir.1991), vacated on other grounds, Sivley v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 , 113 S.Ct. 454 , 121 L.Ed.2d 364 (1992). 2.
In Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 (9th Cir.1991), the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected the Gonzalez approach, concluding that, “a petitioner who has alleged a cause of action under the APA or the Mandamus Act need not rely upon an implied private right of action under any other statute.” Id. at 604-605. 2 Relying on language from Japan Whaling Ass’n v. American Cetacean Soc., 478 U.S. 221 , 231 n. 4, 106 S.Ct. 2860 , 2866 n. 4, 92 L.Ed.2d 166 (1986), the Court r…
green
Idaho Farm Bureau Federation v. Babbitt (1995)
Although this “zone of *1355 interests” requirement “is not meant to be especially demanding,” Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597, 605 (9th Cir.1991), vacated on other grounds, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 454 , 121 L.Ed.2d 364 (1992), the interest Plaintiffs seek to vindicate must at least have ‘“a plausible relationship to the policies’ underlying the statute.” Id. (quoting Clarke v. Securities Indus.
green
Gonzalez v. United States (1995)
In Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 (9th Cir. 1991), the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected the González approach, concluding that, “a petitioner who has alleged a cause of action under the APA or the Mandamus Act need not rely upon an implied private right of action under any other statute.” Id. at 604-05. 2 Relying on language from Japan Whaling Ass’n v. American Cetacean Soc., 478 U.S. 221 , 231 n. 4, 106 S.Ct. 2860 , 2867 n. 4, 92 L.Ed.2d 166 (1986), the Court r…
green
Nwankwo v. Reno (1993)
Section 701 directs the Attorney General to “begin any deportation proceeding as expeditiously as possible after the date of conviction.” In Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597, 600 (9th Cir.1991), vacated as moot, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 454 , 121 L.Ed.2d 364 (1992), Judge Browning set out concisely the “single objective” that Congress sought to accomplish by the enactment of Section 701: Congress enacted Section 701 ... to require the INS to abandon its practice of postponing prisone…
green
Iheme v. Reno (1993)
In Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597, 600 (9th Cir.1991), vacated as moot, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 454 , 121 L.Ed.2d 364 (1992), Judge Browning set out concisely the “single objective” that Congress sought to accomplish by the enactment of Section 701: Congress enacted Section 701 ... to require the INS to abandon its practice of postponing prisoner deportation hearings until after the expiration of a prisoner’s sentence.
green
United States v. Restrepo (1992)
While the lodging of the detainer has no effect on the PSF classification, it will require further incarceration of the defendant in an INS detention facility while he awaits deportation proceedings that should have been undertaken while he was serving his prison sentence. 3 See Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597, 600-01 (9th Cir.1991), petition for cert. filed, (July 8, 1992); Letter from Arthur C.
green
Medina v. United States (1992)
Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597, 606 (9th Cir.1991) (Rymer, J., dissenting).
green
Valencia Gonzalez v. Moran (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 19 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 20 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 21 44 U.S. Constitution amend.
green
Zamudio Leon v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Chavez Mellin v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Rojas v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Soto v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Vera Esquivel v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Calderon v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Escalera Maldonado v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Perez Hernandez v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Zavala Figueroa v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Ramirez Rivera v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Bravo v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Garcia v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Montes v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Medina v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Castrejon v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Jayed v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Moreno Fraijo v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Cancino Valdovinos v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Flores Limon v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Diaz-Godinez v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Martinez v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Barajas Galvan v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Pineda Ramos v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Pamatz Valencia v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Ibarra Diaz v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Reyna v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Brito v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Leyva Morales v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …
green
Camacho Carrillo v. Miller (2024)
See Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370, 1376 (9th Cir. 1994) 17 (cleaned up) (discussing Soler v. Scott, 942 F.2d 597 , 9th Cir. 1991), vacated by 18 Sively v. Soler, 506 U.S. 969 (1992). 19 17 While the Court’s APA-jurisdiction analysis focused solely on the last jurisdiction- 20 stripping sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), see Dismissal Order at 9–10, the Court 21 lacks jurisdiction over the Mandamus Act claim due to the discretion afforded to 22 USCIS by Congress as reflected in …