Cluster 569123 (1991)

The answer requires interpretation of the Annexation Courts' orders, which is a determination that the Annexation Court was uniquely qualified to make." Front Royal V, 945 F.2d at 764.

The answer requires interpretation of the Annexation Courts' orders, which is a determination that the Annexation Court was uniquely qualified to make." Front Royal V, 945 F.2d at 764.

Park Corp. v. Town of Front Royal, Va., 945 F.2d 760, 762-63 (4th Cir.1991) ("[T]he fact that we had jurisdiction over the district court's order regarding absolute immunity did not permit us to review other claims raised below.

Park Corp. v. Town of Front Royal, Va., 945 F.2d 760, 762-63 (4th Cir.1991) (“[T]he fact that we had jurisdiction over the district court’s order regarding absolute immunity did not permit us to review other claims raised below.

Park Corp. v. Town of Front Royal, Va., 945 F.2d 760, 765 (4th Cir.1991); Beacon Hill Farm Assocs.

Front Royal, 945 F.2d at 761-62.

In addition, the court stated that land use questions are the peculiar concern of local and state governments, that state courts should have the first opportunity to decide cases involving local and state land use, and that federal courts should not interfere with state courts in this area. 945 F.2d at 763.

McLaughlin, 945 F.2d 760, 765 (1991).

Managers, Inc. v. Lewis, 559 F.2d 950 , 954 n. 16 (5th Cir. 1977); Front Royal and Warren County Industrial Park Corp. v. Town of Front Royal, 945 F.2d 760, 763 (4th Cir.1991). 2 .

In Burford v. Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315 , 63 S.Ct. 1098 , 87 L.Ed. 1424 , [ ] (1943), the Supreme Court set out a form of abstention which is appropriate in order to prevent unnecessary interference by the federal courts in the interpretation of a complex state regulatory scheme.... “[L]and use questions ... are the peculiar concern of local and state governments, and traditionally, federal courts have not interfered with state courts in the area of land use policy.” ... [Th…

In Front Royal V, the Court of Appeals observed that “[t]he annexation system as set up in Virginia is a complex scheme.” Front Royal V, 945 F.2d at 764.

Id. at 765.

Park Corp. v. Town of Front Royal, Va., 945 F.2d 760, 763 (4th Cir. 1991) (‘[W]e may apply the abstention doctrine at our own instance even if no party urges the doctrine upon us.”).

Park Corp. v. Town of Front Royal, 945 F.2d 760 , 763 (4th Cir. 1991) (“we may apply the abstention doctrine at our own instance even if no party urges the doctrine upon us”). 12 The Fourth Circuit recently noted that “even where jurisdiction is not discretionary, courts may abstain from exercising jurisdiction under certain circumstances that may intrude on the prerogative of state courts.” Trustgard Ins.

See Front Royal and Warren County Industrial Park Corp. v. Town of Front Royal, Va., 945 F.2d 760, 783 (4th Cir.1991).