Simpson v. State (1893)
green
· 49 citation events
across 25 courts.
Showing the 3 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1904 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
190419652026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
State v. Darroch (1982)
He started across the river with his leaden messenger, and *203 was operating it up to the moment when it ceased to move, and was therefore, in a legal sense, after the ball crossed the State line up to the moment that it stopped, in Georgia. 92 Ga. at 43, 46 , 17 S.E. at 985, 986.
green
Ex Parte Robert Clark Rhodes v. State (2015)
See also, Simpson v. State, 17 S.E. 984 , 92 Ga. 41 (Ga. 1893)(discussing “jurisdiction” over acts that occurred outside of the charging state.) A state does not have jurisdiction over an individual for a crime committed within that state when he was located outside the state, did not intend to commit a crime within the state, and could not reasonably foresee that his act would cause, aid or abet in the commission of a crime within that state.
discussing “jurisdiction” over acts that occurred outside of the charging state.
green
Hageseth v. Superior Court (2007)
The detrimental effect theory of extraterritorial jurisdiction has been described as a “doctrine of constructive presence,” a legal fiction considered “necessary to the practical administration of criminal justice.” (State v. Winckler (S.D. 1977) 260 N.W.2d 356, 360 ; see also Simpson v. The State (1893) 92 Ga. 41 [ 17 S.E. 984 ].) Under this common law rule, “if a man in the state of South Carolina criminally fires a ball into the state of Georgia, the law regards him as ac…