Union Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Dottenheim (1899)

green · 79 citation events across 5 courts. Showing the 18 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 18

Treatment trajectory · 1901 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

190119632026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Hodges v. Community Loan & Investment Corp. (1975)

Rule Authority · Ga. · 2 citations in this opinion

Co. v. Dottenheim, 107 Ga. 606, 609 (1) ( 34 SE 217 ).

green Bryant v. Kenerly (1999)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Co. v. Dottenheim, 107 Ga. 606, 614 ( 34 SE 217 ) (1899); Consulting Constr.

green Dearing & Dearing Enterprises, Inc. v. A. R. III, Inc. (1992)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Co. v. Dottenheim, 107 Ga. 606, 614 (1) ( 34 SE 217 ) (1899).

green Ward v. HUDCO LOAN COMPANY (1985)

Rule Authority · Ga.

Co. v. Dottenheim, 107 Ga. 606, 610 ( 34 SE 217 ) (1899). 3.

green West v. Dorsey (1982)

Rule Authority · Ga.

Co. v. Dottenheim, 107 Ga. 606, 610 ( 34 SE 217 ) (1899): “In 1759 the legislature of the province, in an act which in its preamble declared that ‘the high rate of interest’ in the province of Georgia was greatly prejudicial to the welfare of the planters and others, provided...” for a maximum interest rate and a treble damage penalty.

green Commercial Credit Plan, Inc. v. Parker (1979)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Co. v. Dottenheim, 107 Ga. 606, 610, 613-614 ( 34 SE 217 ).

green Hardy v. G. A. C. Finance Corp. (1974)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Co. v. Dottenheim, 107 Ga. 606, 614 ( 34 SE 217 ) and cits.

green Byrd v. Prudential Insurance (1938)

Rule Authority · Ga.

R. 99); Tillman v. Morton, 65 Ga. 386 (2-a); Ray v. Pease, 97 Ga. 618 ( 25 S. E. 360 ); Union Savings Bank v. Dottenheim, 107 Ga. 606, 614 ( 34 S. E. 217 ).

green Family Finance Co. v. Allman (1932)

Rule Authority · Ga.

ITpon the question as to whether the act was special without regard to territorial locality, Mr. Justice Cobb, delivering the opinion in Union Savings Bank v. Dot tenheim, 107 Ga. 606, 626-628 ( 34 S. E. 217 ), said: “While the question now under consideration was not directly involved in the case of Cook v. Loan Association, 104 Ga. 814 [ 30 S. E. 911 ], some of the language used by Justice Lewis in the opinion in that case is pertinent to the present discussion.

green Pendergrass v. New York Life Insurance (1927)

Rule Authority · Ga.

The Civil Code (1910), § 3436, provides that “It shall not be lawful for any person, company, or corporation to reserve, charge, or take for any loan or advance of money, or forbearance to enforce the collection of any sum of money, any rate of interest greater than eight per centum per annum, either directly or indirectly by way of commission for advances, discount, exchange, or by any contract or contrivance or device whatever.” In the case of Pinckard v. Ponder, 6 Ga. 253…

green NeSmith v. NeSmith (1924)

Rule Authority · Ga.

Nor is section 21, supra, obnoxious to art. 1, sec. 4, par. 1, of the constitution (Civil Code of 1910, § 6391), which provides that “Laws of a general nature shall have uniform operation throughout the State, and no special law shall be enacted in any case for which provision has been made by an existing general law. ” It is not a special law and in violation of Civil Code (1910), § 5272, which provides that “All debts owing to the defendant, and all property, money, or eff…

green Loganville Banking Co. v. Forrester (1915)

Rule Authority · Ga.

McKenzie v. Flannery, 90 Ga. 591 (5), 599 ( 16 S. E. 710 ); Union Savings Bank v. Dottenheim, 107 Ga. 606, 614 ( 34 S. E. 217 ); McCall v. Herring, 116 Ga. 235, 243 ( 42 S. E. 468 ).

green Butler v. First National Bank (1913)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Union Savings Bank v. Dottenheim, 107 Ga. 606, 614 ( 34 S. E. 217 ); Ellard v. Scottish Mortgage Co., 97 Ga. 329 ( 22 S. E. 893 ); Tillman v. Morton, 65 Ga. 386 ; Merck v. Am.

green Lindenberg v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (1981)

Cited · N.D. Ga. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See generally Union Savings Bank v. Dottenheim, 107 Ga. 606 , 34 S.E. 217 (1898), 18 Ency.Ga.Law, Interest § 2 (1981).

green Chappell v. Kilgore (1943)

Cited · Ga. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See the many authorities cited in the opinion in Union Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Dottenheim, 107 Ga. 606, 618-624 ( 34 S. E. 217 ). 2.

green Ætna Insurance v. Brigham (1904)

Cited · Ga. · signal: see

See majority opinion in Union Savings Bank v. Dottenheim, 107 Ga. 606 ; Dugger v. Insurance Co., 95 Tenn. 246 (4). 5.

green McGinnis v. Ragsdale (1902)

Cited · Ga. · signal: see

See Union Savings Bank v. Dottenheim, 107 Ga. 606 (2), and cases cited.

green Brown v. Atlanta Railway & Power Co. (1901)

Cited · Ga. · signal: see

See Union Savings Bank v. Dottenheim, 107 Ga. 606 .