How cited: Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Brunswick Grocery Co. · Go Syfert

Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Brunswick Grocery Co. (1901)

green · 28 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1902 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
190219642026
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co. v. Brunswick Grocery Co., 113 Ga. 786, 789 ( 39 SE 483 ) (1901) (it is “manifestly erroneous” for a party to the “issue” to be excluded from the courtroom) (emphasis supplied); Mays v. Tharpe & Brooks, Inc., 143 Ga. App. 815, 816 ( 240 SE2d 159 ) (1977) (“A substantial right of a party to litigation is to be present at the trial and render assistance to his counsel as the developments unfold”); Walden v. MARTA, 161 Ga. App. 725, 726 ( 288 SE2d 671 ) (1982) (in sequesteri…
green Kesterson v. Jarrett (2012)
Rule Authority · Ga. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co. v. Brunswick Grocery Co., 113 Ga. 786, 789 ( 39 SE 483 ) (1901). 3 A party may also forfeit the right to be in court by disrupting “ ‘the decorum and respect inherent in the concept of courts and judicial proceedings,’ ” although trial courts must use care in excluding a party for this reason and the right to be present may be reclaimed if the party becomes willing and able to be non-disruptive.
green Barber v. Barber (1987)
Rule Authority · Ga. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co. v. Brunswick Grocery Co., 113 Ga. 786, 789 ( 39 SE 483 ) (1901).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Co. v. Brunswick Grocery Co., 113 Ga. 786, 789 ( 39 SE 483 ) (1901) (party to the issue on trial had right to be present, and it was manifestly erroneous to exclude her from the courtroom); Walden v. MARTA, 161 Ga. App. 725, 726 ( 288 SE2d 671 ) (1982) (party to the issue on trial has aright to be present); Mays v. Tharpe & Brooks, 143 Ga. App. 815, 816 ( 240 SE2d 159 ) (1977) (a substantial right of a party to litigation is to be present at the trial and render assistance t…
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Maxx, supra. 10 Ga. Railroad & Banking Co. v. Tice, 124 Ga. 459, 465 ( 52 SE 916 ) (1905) (party to cause on trial had a right to remain in court during entire trial); Saint Paul Fire &c.Co. v. Brunswick Grocery Co., 113 Ga. 786, 789 ( 39 SE 483 ) (1901) (party to the issue on trial had right to be present, and it was manifestly erroneous to exclude her from the courtroom); Walden v. MARTA, 161 Ga. App. 725, 726 ( 288 SE2d 671 ) (1982) (party to the issue on trial has a righ…
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Co., 113 Ga. 786, 791 ( 39 SE 483 ); Holmes v. Pope, 1 Ga. App. 338, 343 ( 58 SE 281 ); Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Southern Grocery Co., 2 Ga. App. 545, 548 ( 59 SE 473 ); Neely Co. v. Bank of Waynesboro, 7 Ga. App. 390, 392 ( 66 SE 1099 ); Southern Amusement Co. v. Neal, 15 Ga. App. 130, 132 ( 82 SE 765 ); Johnson v. Varnum, 43 Ga. App. 737 (1) ( 159 SE 908 ); First Nat.
Rule Authority · Ga.
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Brunswick Grocery Co., 113 Ga. 786, 790 ( 39 S. E. 483 ); Steele v. Gatlin, 115 Ga. 929, 931 ( 42 S. E. 253 , 59 L.R.A. 129 ); Sprouse v. Skinner, 155 Ga. 119, 123 ( 116 S. E. 606 ).