How cited: Cluster 573910 · Go Syfert

Cluster 573910 (1992)

green · 34 citation events across 8 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199220092026
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
RTC v. Kemp, 951 F.2d 657, 662 (5th Cir.1992).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
RTC v. Kemp, 951 F.2d 657, 662 (5th Cir.1992).
Rule Authority · N.D. Tex.
As a result, liability cannot attach to GE. 17 951 F.2d 657 (5th Cir. 1992). 18 Id. at 662. 19 Doc. 97 at App. 432.
Quote Authority · Tex. App.
Corp. v. Kemp, 951 F.2d 657 , 665 (5th Cir. 1992) (“Under Texas law, a purchaser who makes improvements upon property in the good faith belief that it has good title to the property is entitled to compensation for the improvements.”)).4 4 Question 4 reads as follows: Did Glynn Walker and Melinda Walker make improvements to the property located at 1508 Galveston Avenue, Port Bolivar, Texas 77650 in the good faith belief that they were the true owners of the property?
“Under Texas law, a purchaser who makes improvements upon property in the good faith belief that it has good title to the property is entitled to compensation for the improvements.”
Rule Authority · E.D. Tex.
It is far from clear that the parties to the OFA intended to confer any benefit beyond the release to “customers” in Section 3.1 upon Nokia, and “[a]ny doubt should be resolved against finding an intent to benefit a third party.” See Kemp, 951 F.2d at 663.
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Co., 26 F.3d 531 , 540 (5th Cir.1994); RTC v. Kemp, 951 F.2d 657, 662 (5th Cir. 1992).
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
CODE § 13.002(1); see also Resolution Trust Corp. v. Kemp, 951 F.2d 657 , 661 (5th Cir. 1992).
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
The Texas Property Code provides that “[a]n instrument that is properly recorded in the proper county is '... notice to all persons of the existence of the instrument.” Tex. Prop.Code § 13.002(1); see also Resolution Trust Corp. v. Kemp, 951 F.2d 657 , 661 (5th Cir.1992).
Cited (see also) · 3rd Cir. · signal: see also
Because Grand Lockwood is not a party to the Marine Indemnity insurance contract, "it follows that [the Marine Indemnity insurance] contract will not be construed as having been made for the benefit of [Grand Lockwood] unless it clearly appears that this was the intention of the contracting parties." Id.; see also Resolution Trust Corp. v. Kemp, 951 F.2d 657 , 662 (5th Cir.1992).
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see also
Because Grand Lockwood is not a party to the Marine Indemnity insurance contract, “it follows that [the Marine Indemnity insurance] contract will not be construed as having been made for the benefit of [Grand Lockwood] unless it dearly appears that this was the intention of the contracting parties.” Id.; see also Resolution Trust Corp. v. Kemp, 951 F.2d 657 , 662 (5th Cir.1992).
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Resolution Trust Corp. v. Kemp, 951 F.2d 657 , 663 (5th Cir.1992) (when parties to agreement did not intend to benefit non-party, non-party could not enforce release provisions of agreement); Derr Constr.
Cited · N.D. Tex. · signal: see
See Resolution Trust Corp. v. Kemp, 951 F.2d 657 , 662 (5th Cir.1992) (citing Old Stone Bank v. Fidelity Bank, 749 F.Supp. 147, 152 (N.D.Tex.1990) (collecting Texas cases)).
Cited (see also) · Tex. · signal: see also
This dispute appears to relate primarily to the drilling costs of the first well, as the second well was drilled after Sheppard’s lease had terminated, and she does not complain of the trial court’s order allowing drilling costs of that well to be deducted from the proceeds she is owed on that well. 28 .Sharp v. Stacy, 535 S.W.2d 345, 351 (Tex.1976); see also Resolution Trust Corp. v. Kemp, 951 F.2d 657 , 665 (5th Cir.1992) ("Under Texas law, a purchaser who makes improvemen…