Mesteller v. Gwinnett County (2013)
green
· 14 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 6 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
See also Crestlawn Mem’l Park, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, 235 37 Ga. 194 , 194 (1975) (upholding a “sanitary service charge” for the “cleaning of the public streets abutting appellant’s property” because the “assessments … are not taxes”); Levetan v. Lanier Worldwide, Inc., 265 Ga. 323, 324 (1995) (“These sanitation assessments are not taxes within the meaning of our Constitution but rather charges for services rendered by the county.”); Strykr v. Long County Bd. of Comm’rs, 2…
solid waste fee is an assessment for services rendered
green
Savage v. State of Georgia (2015)
See Mesteller v. Gwinnett County, 292 Ga. 675, 676-677 ( 740 SE2d 605 ) (2013) (explaining that a county may choose to provide a constitutionally authorized service through a contract with a private company).
See Mesteller v. Gwinnett County, 292 Ga. 675, 678 ( 740 SE2d 605 ) (2013) (ordinance authorizing county to enter into private solid waste collection contracts with limited number of providers has a “real and substantial relation” to the provision of solid waste collection services).
See Mesteller v. Gwinnett County, 292 Ga. 675, 678 ( 740 SE2d 605 ) (2013) (ordinance authorizing county to enter into private solid waste collection contracts with limited number of providers has a “real and substantial relation” to the provision 8 of solid waste collection services).
green
BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. COBB COUNTY (2019)
See Mesteller v. Gwinnett County, 292 Ga. 675, 678 (4) ( 740 SE2d 605 ) (2013) (rejecting property owner’s argument that solid waste fee is an unlawful tax because garbage collection services were carried out by private companies, because Court previously has held such charges are not taxes).
green
Bellsouth Telecomms., LLC v. Cobb Cnty. (2019)
See Mesteller v. Gwinnett County , 292 Ga. 675 , 678 (4), 740 S.E.2d 605 (2013) (rejecting property owner's argument that solid waste fee is an unlawful tax because garbage collection services were carried out by private companies, because Court previously has held such charges are not taxes).