Clackum v. State (1936)

green · 30 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 8

Treatment trajectory · 1938 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

193819822026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Walker v. State (2012)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

(Citation and punctuation omitted.) Clackum v. State, 55 Ga. App. 44, 51 ( 189 SE 397 ) (1936).

green Devine v. State (1997)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Clackum v. State, 55 Ga. App. 44, 49 (5) ( 189 SE 397 ) (1936) (false testimony of purported eyewitness for civil plaintiff that he had not spoken with plaintiff’s attorney prior to trial material and chargeable as perjury).

green Floyd v. State (1959)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Clackum v. State, 55 Ga. App. 44, 51 (12) ( 189 S. E. 397 ), and cits.

green Hill v. State (1955)

Rule Authority · Ga.

Co., 111 Ga. 815 ( 35 S. E. 671 ); Clackum v. State, 55 Ga. App. 44, 49 (7) ( 189 S. E. 397 ), and cases there cited. 2.

green Darnell v. State (1940)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Clackum v. State, 55 Ga. App. 44, 49 ( 189 S. E. 397 ); Black v. State, 13 Ga. App. 541 (3) ( 79 S. E. 173 ).

green Dwight T. Brown v. State (2013)

Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Clackum v. State, 55 Ga. App. 44, 47 ( 189 SE 397 ) (1936) (challenge to grand jurors on the ground that they were employees of the company that contributed to a fund for the prosecution of the charges against the defendant alleged a disqualification propter affectum, and thus did not support defendant’s motion to quash indictment or a plea in abatement).

green Brown v. State (2013)

Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

green Platt v. National General Insurance (1992)

Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Clackum v. State, 55 Ga. App. 44, 49 (7) ( 189 SE 397 ); Green, supra at § 130. “ ‘A witness can not, without finally testifying from his recollection of the facts, swear from a written memorandum without showing that he made the memorandum or at some time knew it to be correct.’ ” Proctor & Gamble Co. v. Blakely Oil &c.