N.T. \Brother\" Greene (1992)
green
· 18 citation events
across 8 courts.
Showing the 10 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Board of Trustees of Painesville Township Mayridge Construction Company v. City of Painesville, Ohio (1999)
See Hallstrom v. Tillamook County, 493 U.S. 20, 26 , 110 S.Ct. 304 , 107 L.Ed.2d 237 (1989); see also Walls, 761 F.2d at 316 (holding that “compliance with the sixty day notice requirement is a jurisdictional prerequisite to bringing suit against private defendants under the ... [CWA]”); Greene v. Reilly, 956 F.2d 593, 594 (6th Cir.1992) (similar).
green
New Mexico Citizens for Clean Air and Water Pueblo of San Juan v. Espanola Mercantile Company, Inc., Doing Bu… (1996)
See Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. v. Windall, 51 F.3d 1179 , 1189 n. 15 (3d Cir.1995); Washington Trout v. McCain Foods, Inc., 45 F.3d 1351, 1354 (9th Cir.1995); Greene v. Reilly, 956 F.2d 593, 594 (6th Cir.1992); National Envtl.
green
Sierra Club Ohio Chapter v. City of Columbus (2003)
See Bd. of Trustees of Painesville Township v. City of Painesville, 200 F.3d 396, 400 (6th Cir.1999) (citing Walls v. Waste, Resource Corp., 761 F.2d 311, 316 (6th Cir.1985)); Greene v. Reilly, 956 F.2d 593, 594 (6th Cir.1992) (“the notice requirement is not a mere technical wrinkle of statutory drafting or formality to be waived by the federal courts”) (internal quotations omitted).
green
Stephens v. Koch Foods, LLC (2009)
Nat’l Parks Conservation Ass’n, Inc. v. Tenn. Valley Auth., 175 F.Supp.2d 1071, 1077 (E.D.Tenn.2001) (citing Greene v. Reilly, 956 F.2d 593, 594 (6th Cir.1992)); see also Walls v. Waste Res.
Greene v. Reilly, 956 F.2d 593, 594 (6th Cir.1992).
Greene v. Reilly, 956 F.2d 593, 594 (6th Cir.1992); Walls v. Waste Resource Corp., 761 F.2d 311, 316 (6th Cir.1985); Ada-Cascade Watch Co. v. Cascade Resource Recovery, 720 F.2d 897 , 908 (6th Cir.1983).
States Legal Found., Inc., v. United Musical Instruments, 61 F.3d 473, 478 (6th Cir. 1995); see also Greene v. Reilly, 956 F.2d 593, 594 (6th Cir. 1992) (explaining that “the notice requirement is not a mere technical wrinkle of statutory drafting or formality to be waived by the federal courts” (citation omitted)).
explaining that “the notice requirement is not a mere technical wrinkle of statutory drafting or formality to be waived by the federal courts” (citation omitted)
green
Siemientkowski v. Moreland Homes, Inc. (2002)
See Greene v. Reilly, 956 F.2d 593, 594 (6th Cir.1992).
See Greene v. Reilly, 20 ELR 21161 (W-D.Tenn.1990), aff'd on other grounds, 956 F.2d 593 (6th Cir.1992).
green
Bettis v. Town of Ontario, NY (1992)
Under these circumstances, “the District Court must dismiss the action as barred by the terms of the statute.” Hallstrom v. Tillamook County, 493 U.S. 20, 33 , 110 S.Ct. 304, 312 , 107 L.Ed.2d 237 (1989); see also Greene v. Reilly, 956 F.2d 593, 594 (6th Cir.1992) (plaintiff who reported alleged violations to various EPA officials but who did not notify EPA of plans to sue did not satisfy requirements for CWA suit against EPA Administrator); Save the Yaak Committee v. Block,…