Dr. David Zar v. South Dakota Board Of Examiners Of Psychologists (1992)
green
· 53 citation events
across 13 courts.
Showing the 26 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199220092026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
David Torgerson v. City of Rochester (2010)
Bd. of Exam'r of Psychologists, 976 F.2d 459, 467 (8th Cir. 1992) ("This claim of discrimination based upon national origin is insufficient to state a § 1981 claim."). 10 We note that, for whatever reasons, the Fire Department lacks gender and racial diversity.
"This claim of discrimination based upon national origin is insufficient to state a § 1981 claim."
green
Billy Thornton, Jr. v. Marvin Evans, Jr. (2012)
Bd. of Exam’rs of Psychologists, 976 F.2d 459, 465 (8th Cir.1992) (deprivation of constitutionally protected interest in life, liberty, or property is not due process violation and not actionable under § 1983 unless and until state fails to provide due process; no actionable due process violation occurred where adequate post-deprivation remedy existed); see also Ray v. Am.
green
Torgerson v. City of Rochester (2011)
Bd. of Exam'rs of Psychologists, 976 F.2d 459, 467 (8th Cir.1992) ("This claim of discrimination based upon national origin is insufficient to state a § 1981 claim.").
green
Torgerson v. City of Rochester (2010)
Bd. of Exam’rs of Psychologists, 976 F.2d 459, 467 (8th Cir.1992) (“This claim of discrimination based upon national origin is insufficient to state a § 1981 claim.”).
green
Charles E. Gunter v. William J. Morrison (2007)
Bd. of Exam’rs of Psychologists, 976 F.2d 459, 465 (8th Cir. 1992) (“A person’s constitutional right of access to the courts cannot be impaired by threats or harassment in retaliation for filing lawsuits”); In re Workers’ Comp.
“A person’s constitutional right of access to the courts cannot be impaired by threats or harassment in retaliation for filing lawsuits”
green
Gunter v. Morrison (2007)
Bd. of Exam’rs of Psychologists, 976 F.2d 459, 465 (8th Cir.1992) (“A person’s constitutional right of access to the courts cannot be impaired by threats or harassment in retaliation for filing lawsuits”); In re Workers’ Comp.
green
Scheeler v. City Of St. Cloud (2005)
Bd. of Examiners, 976 F.2d 459, 464 (8th Cir.1992).
green
Ristow v. Peterson (2022)
Id. at 462-64.
Gundacker, 151 F.3d at 848 (citing Zar, 976 F.2d at 463-64). b.
green
Philpott v. Arkansas Department of Corrections (2025)
Bd. of Exam’rs of Psychologists, 976 F.2d 459, 464 (8th Cir. 1992) (state departments not “persons” under § 1983).
state departments not “persons” under § 1983
green
Jensen v. College Town Pizza, Inc. (2024)
Bd. of Exam’rs of Psychs., 976 F.2d 459, 467 (8th Cir. 1992) (“This claim of discrimination based upon national origin is insufficient to state a § 1981 claim.”).
“This claim of discrimination based upon national origin is insufficient to state a § 1981 claim.”
green
Titus v. Omega Center (2024)
Bd. of Exam'rs of Psychologists, 976 F.2d 459, 464 (8th Cir. 1992) (state departments not “persons” under § 1983); De La Garza v. Kandiyohi Cty.
state departments not “persons” under § 1983
green
Vanderbilt v. Arkansas Department of Corrections (2023)
Bd. of Exam’rs of Psychologists, 976 F.2d 459, 464 (8th Cir. 1992) (state departments not “persons” under § 1983).
state departments not “persons” under § 1983
green
Soboyede v. KLDiscovery (2021)
Bd. of Exam’rs of Psychologists, 976 F.2d 459, 467 (8th Cir. 1992)).
Bd. of Exam’rs of Psychologists, 976 F.2d 459, 467 (8th Cir.1992).
green
Czechorowski v. State (2005)
Bd. of Exam’rs of Psychologists, 976 F.2d 459, 466-68 (8th Cir. 1992) (attorney’s actions before medical board of examiners protected by absolute immunity); State v. Superior Ct., 921 P.2d 697, 701 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996) (assistant attorney general who filed and prosecuted civil injunction action against adult care facility on behalf of Department of Health Services entitled to absolute immunity from later malicious prosecution complaint); State Bd. of Chi ropractic Exam’rs v…
attorney’s actions before medical board of examiners protected by absolute immunity
green
Carhart v. Smith (2001)
See O’Sullivan v. Minnesota, 191 F.3d 965 , 968-69 (8th Cir.1999); Cromley v. Board of Education, 17 F.3d 1059, 1068-69 (7th Cir.1994); Hamer v. Brown, 831 F.2d 1398, 1403 (8th Cir.1987); Zar v. South Dakota Board of Examiners of Psychologists, 976 F.2d 459, 465 (8th Cir.1992).
green
Fink v. Kitzman (1995)
Cleavinger, 474 U.S. at 206 , 106 S.Ct. at 503 ; see also Howard v. Suskie, 26 F.3d 84, 86 (8th Cir.1994) (no absolute immunity absent adjudicatory safeguards spelled out in Cleavinger ); Krueger v. Lyng, 4 F.3d 653, 656-57 (8th Cir.1993) (same); Zar, 976 F.2d at 464 (administrative safeguards).
administrative safeguards
green
Erik Gundacker v. Unisys Corporation (1998)
See Zar v. South Dakota Bd. of Exam’rs of Psychologists, 976 F.2d 459 , 463-64 (8th Cir. 1992).
green
Stanley D. Rabushka, Ex Rel. United States of America Stanley D. Rabushka v. Crane Company (1997)
See Zar v. South Dakota Bd. of Examiners of Psychologists, 976 F.2d 459 , 463-64 (8th Cir.1992) (standard of review).
green
Stanley Rabushka v. Crane Co. (1997)
See Zar v. South Dakota Bd. of Examiners of Psychologists, 976 F.2d 459 , 463-64 (8th Cir. 1992) (standard of review).
standard of review
green
Brodnicki v. City Of Omaha (1996)
See Zar v. South Dakota Bd. of Examiners, 976 F.2d 459 , 466 (8th Cir.1992); Williams v. Hartje, 827 F.2d 1203, 1210 (8th Cir.1987). 18 Brodnicki maintains that Jansen is not entitled to absolute immunity with respect to the interviews that Jansen's investigator conducted with Brodnicki's potential witnesses.
green
Edward Brodnicki v. City of Omaha (1996)
See Zar v. South Dakota Bd. of Examiners, 976 F.2d 459 , 466 (8th Cir.1992); Williams v. Hartje, 827 F.2d 1203, 1210 (8th Cir.1987).
See Zar v. South Dakota Bd. of Examiners, 976 F.2d 459 , 465 (8th Cir.1992).
See Zar v. South Dakota Bd. of Examiners, 976 F.2d 459 , 465 (8th Cir.1992).
green
Schwartz v. Pridy (1995)
Will v. Michigan Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 71 , 109 S.Ct. 2304, 2312 , 105 L.Ed.2d 45 (1989); Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. at -, 112 S.Ct. at 362-64 ; accord Zar v. South Dakota Bd. of Examiners of Psychologists, 976 F.2d 459 , 464 (8th Cir.1992); Get Away Club, Inc. v. Coleman, 969 F.2d 664, 668 (8th Cir.1992).