How cited: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Go Syfert

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit (1993)

green · 68 citation events across 18 courts. Showing the 20 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199320092026
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 3 citations in this opinion
In Trustees of the Electrical Workers Health & Welfare Trust v. Marjo Corp., 988 F.2d 865, 867 (9th Cir.1992), we interpreted ERISA’s preemption clause broadly, in accordance with two pre-Travelers decisions, Pilot Life Ins.
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Workers Health & Welfare Trust v. Marjo Corp., 988 F.2d 865, 866 (9th Cir.1992) (ERISA preempts state law that makes general contractor liable for contributions owed to plans by subcontractor-employer).
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Workers Health & Welfare Trust v. Marjo Corp., 988 F.2d 865, 866 (9th Cir.1992) (ERISA preempts state law that makes general contractor liable for contributions owed to plans by subcontractor-employer).
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Workers Health & Welfare Trust v. Marjo Corp., 988 F.2d 865, 867-68 (9th Cir.1993) (disavowing the pre-emption holding of Carpenters S. Cal. Admin.
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Workers Health & Welfare Trust v. Marjo Corp., 988 F.2d 865, 867-68 (9th Cir.1993) (disavowing the pre-emption holding of Carpenters S. Cal. Admin.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Assuming arguendo that these cases are still good law, but see Trustees of Electrical Workers Health and Welfare Trust v. Marjo Corp., 988 F.2d 865, 867-68 (9th Cir.1992), they nonetheless do not support the majority's conclusion. 83 In D & L Camp, the issue was whether the surety of an employer was acting "indirectly in the interests of an employer" under section 1002(5).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Assuming arguendo that these cases are still good law, but see Trustees of Electrical Workers Health and Welfare Trust v. Marjo Corp., 988 F.2d 865, 867-68 (9th Cir.1992), they nonetheless do not support the majority’s conclusion.
Rule Authority · N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 3 citations in this opinion
Workers Health and Welfare Trust v. Marjo Corp., 988 F. 2d 865, 868 (9th Cir.1993) ( Marjo ); Bricklayers, supra, 950 F. 2d at 118; M.C.
Rule Authority · D. Nev.
Nevertheless Grove asserts that the exact issue before this court was already decided in its favor in Trustees of Electrical Workers Health and Welfare Trust v. Marjo, 988 F.2d 865, 867 (9th Cir.1992), which held NRS 608.150 preempted by ERISA.
Rule Authority · D.R.I.
Workers Health & Welfare Trust v. Marjo Corp., 988 F.2d 865, 867-68 (9th Cir.1993) (disavowing preemption holding of D & L Camp).
Rule Authority · S.D. Cal.
Workers Health & Welfare Trust v. Marjo Corp., 988 F.2d 865, 866 (9th Cir.1992) (citations omitted).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Marjo, 988 F.2d at 867. 21 In Carpenters Health v. Tri-Capital, we admittedly read ERISA's preemption clause very broadly, noting that the Supreme Court has recognized that ERISA preemption is "conspicuous for its breadth." See 25 F.3d 849 , 853 (9th Cir. 1993) (quoting Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendon, 498 U.S. 133, 138 , 112 L.
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
Second, the “consumer expectation” test requires that the product be “dangerous to an extent beyond that which would be contemplated by the ordinary consumer who purchases it, with the ordinary knowledge common to the community as to its *675 characteristics Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A cmt. i (1965); see Pree, 988 F.2d at 865 & 867 (citing Cryts v. Ford Motor Co., 571 S.W.2d 688, 688 (Mo.Ct.App.1978) and Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A, cmt. i); see also Linega…
Cited (see also) · 1st Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Trust ees of Electrical Workers Health and Welfare Trust v. Marjo Corp., 988 F.2d 865 (9th Cir.1992) (preempting state law imposing liability on general contractors for benefits owed by subcontractors).
green Simas v. Quaker (1993)
Cited (see also) · 1st Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., ___ ____ Trustees of Electrical Workers Health and Welfare Trust v. __________________________________________________________ Marjo Corp., 988 F.2d 865 (9th Cir. 1992) (preempting state ____________ -17- -17- III.
Cited (see also) · 1st Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Trustees of Electrical Workers Health and Welfare Trust v. Marjo Corp., 988 F.2d 865 (9th Cir.1992) (preempting state law imposing liability on general contractors for benefits owed by subcontractors)
Cited · D.N.J. · signal: see
See id. at 1153 n. 13.
Cited · D.N.J. · signal: see
See id. at 1153 n. 13.
Cited · Conn. Super. Ct. · signal: see
See Trustees of Electrical Workers Health and Welfare Trust v. Marjo Corp. , 988 F.2d 865 , 867-68 (9th Cir. 1992); Bricklayers Local 33 v. America's Marble Source , 950 F.2d 114 (3d Cir. 1991); Prestridge v. Shinault , 552 So.2d 643 (La.App.Ct. 1989).