How cited: Lapidus v. Hiltzik · Go Syfert

Lapidus v. Hiltzik (1990)

green · 10 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 3 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Quote Authority · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See Lapidus v. Hiltzik, 160 A.D.2d 682, 683 (2d Dep’t 1990) (“[T]he defendants’ release of [plaintiff’s] debt constituted consideration given in exchange for the return of the stock to the corporation.”).
“[T]he defendants’ release of [plaintiff’s] debt constituted consideration given in exchange for the return of the stock to the corporation.”
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Lapidus v. Hiltzik, 160 A.D.2d 682 , 553 N.Y.S.2d 458, 459-60 (2d Dept.1990) (“when signatures on a certificated security are admitted or estabr lished, production of such security entitles a holder to recover on it unless the plaintiff establishes a ... defect going to the validity of the security”); see also Kaufman v. Diversified Industries, Inc., 460 F.2d 1331, 1334 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1038 , 93 S.Ct. 517 , 34 L.Ed.2d 487 (1972); Matthysse v. Securities…
green In Re County of Orange (1997)
Cited (see also) · Bankr. C.D. Cal. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., Lapidus v. Hiltzik, 160 A.D.2d 682 , 553 N.Y.S.2d 458, 460 (1990) (holding that where plaintiff had possession of a stock certificate and the signature on the certificates was admitted, plaintiff was entitled to recover on it unless the other party "established] a ... defect going to the validity of the security (UCC 8-105[3][c])"). 19 .
holding that where plaintiff had possession of a stock certificate and the signature on the certificates was admitted, plaintiff was entitled to recover on it unless the other party "established] a ... defect going to the validity of the security (UCC 8-105[3][c])"