How cited: Gina Gates v. Unified School District No. 449 Of Leavenworth County, Kansas · Go Syfert

Gina Gates v. Unified School District No. 449 Of Leavenworth County, Kansas (1993)

green · 120 citation events across 16 courts. Showing the 35 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199320092026
Rule Authority · 10th Cir. · 4 citations in this opinion
No. 449 of Leavenworth County, Kan., 996 F.2d 1035, 1041 (10th Cir.1993); see also P.H. v. Sch.
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
No. 449 of Leavenworth County, Kan., 996 F.2d 1035, 1041 (10th Cir.1993).
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
Furthermore, "the existence of a pattern of tortious conduct ... may tend to show that the lack of proper training ... is the 'moving factor' behind the plaintiff's injury." Id. (emphasis added). 11 Consonant with Brown, the Tenth Circuit has created a three-part test that a plaintiff must prove in order to hold a municipality liable in a § 1983 suit: (1) "The existence of a continuing, persistent and widespread practice of unconstitutional misconduct by the [municipality's]…
green Trujillo v. Shields (1998)
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
Consonant with Brown, the Tenth Circuit has created a three-part test that a plaintiff must prove in order to hold a municipality liable in a § 1983 suit: (1) “The existence of a continuing, persistent and widespread practice of unconstitutional misconduct by the [municipality’s] employees”; (2) “Deliberate indifference to or tacit approval of such misconduct by the [municipality’s] policymaking officials . . . after notice to the officials of that particular misconduct”; an…
Rule Authority · E.D. Cal. · 6 citations in this opinion
For example, in Gates, a teacher sexually assaulted a student at school, and the student brought a § 1983 claim against the school principal, among others. 996 F.2d at 1036.
Rule Authority · N.D. Okla. · 2 citations in this opinion
No. 449, 996 F.2d 1035, 1041 (10th Cir. 1993); see also Rost ex rel.
green Maxfield v. Bressler (2013)
Rule Authority · D. Colo. · 2 citations in this opinion
See Monell, 436 U.S. at 690 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 ; Gates, 996 F.2d at 1041.
green Brown v. Whitman (2009)
Rule Authority · D. Colo. · 2 citations in this opinion
The plaintiff must prove: “(1) The existence of a continuing, persistent and widespread practice of unconstitutional misconduct by the ... [municipality’s] employees; (2) Deliberate indifference to or tacit approval such misconduct by the ... [municipality’s] policymaking officials ... after notice to the officials of that particular misconduct; and (3) That the plaintiff was injured by virtue of the unconstitutional acts pursuant to the ... [municipality’s] custom and that …
Rule Authority · D. Kan. · 2 citations in this opinion
No. 449 of Leavenworth County, Kansas, 996 F.2d 1035, 1041 (10th Cir.1993).
green Armstrong v. Lamy (1996)
Rule Authority · D. Mass. · 2 citations in this opinion
No. 449 of Leavenworth County, Kan., 996 F.2d 1035, 1041 (10th Cir.1993).
Rule Authority · D. Colo.
Here, Plaintiff must establish a custom of “failure to receive, investigate or act on” complaints of violations of employees’ First Amendment rights by showing: 1) the “existence of a continuing, persistent and widespread practice of unconstitutional misconduct by” County employees; 2) “[d]eliberate indifference to or tacit approval of such misconduct” by the Board “after notice to the officials of that particular misconduct”; and 3) that Plaintiff “was injured by virtue of …
Rule Authority · D.N.M.
Plaintiff fails to plausibly allege that there was a “pattern of persistent and widespread unconstitutional practices that had become so permanent and well- settled as to have the force and effect of law.” Gates, 996 F.2d at 1042.
Rule Authority · D. Utah
In most instances, notice can be established by proving 55 Brammer-Hoelter v. Twin Peaks Charter Acad., 602 F.3d 1175, 1189 (10th Cir. 2010) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). 56 Carney v. City & Cty. of Denver, 534 F.3d 1269, 1274 (10th Cir. 2008) (quoting Gates, 996 F.2d at 1041). 57 Id. 58 Docket No. 47-1, at 5. 59 City of Canton, Ohio v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 388 (1989). the existence of a pattern of tortious conduct.
green Parson v. Palmer (2023)
Rule Authority · E.D. Va.
No. 449 of Leavenworth County, Kan., 996 F.2d 1035, 1041 (10th Cir. 1993)).
Rule Authority · D. Kan.
No. 449 of Leavenworth Cnty., Kan., 996 F.2d 1035, 1042 (10th Cir. 1993). -17- As shown below, plaintiff has established a genuine issue of material fact whether Swender, Dozier and the Trustees violated her First Amendment rights when Dozier issued and Swender and the Trustees enforced the Notice.
Rule Authority · D. Colo.
No. 449 of Leavenworth Cnty., Kan., 996 F.2d 1035, 1041 (10th Cir. 1993).
Rule Authority · D. Colo.
No. 449 of Leavenworth Cty., Kan., 996 F.2d 1035, 1041 (10th Cir. 1993).
Rule Authority · D.N.M.
No. 449 of Leavenworth Cty., Kan., 996 F.2d 1035, 1041 (10th Cir. 1993).
Rule Authority · D. Mass.
No. 449 of Leavenworth Cty., Kan., 996 F.2d 1035, 1041 (10th Cir. 1993) (requiring showing that individual supervisor “received notice of a pattern of violations”); and Stoneking v. Bradford Area Sch.
requiring showing that individual supervisor “received notice of a pattern of violations”
green Wirtz v. Regalado (2020)
Rule Authority · N.D. Okla.
Gates, 996 F.2d at 1041.
Rule Authority · D. Utah
No. 449, 996 F.2d 1035 , 1041 (10th Cir. 1993). 39 Brammer-Hoelter v. Twin Peaks Charter Acad., 602 F.3d 1175, 1189 (10th Cir. 2010) (quotation marks and citations omitted). 40 Carney v. City & Cty. of Denver, 534 F.3d 1269, 1274 (10th Cir. 2008) (quoting Gates, 996 F.2d at 1041). 41 Id. that they would face repercussions if they did so.42 In support of this statement, Ms. Sutton- Williams, who was no longer working at the jail at the time of Mr. Hunter’s death, testified th…
Rule Authority · D.N.M.
No. 449, 996 F.2d at 1041.
green Schultz v. Utah County (2013)
Rule Authority · D. Utah
No. 449 of Leavenworth County, Kan., 996 F.2d 1035, 1041 (10th Cir.1993). .
Rule Authority · D. Colo.
K.C., 511 F.3d at 1125 ; Gates, 996 F.2d at 1041.
green BT v. David (2007)
Rule Authority · D.N.M.
No. 449, 996 F.2d at 1043, a plaintiff must establish an affirmative link between the Defendants' conduct and the alleged constitutional violations of their subordinates by alleging the Defendants' direct participation, their exercise of control or direction, or their failure to supervise, see Serna v. Colo. Dep't of Corr., 455 F.3d at 1152.
Rule Authority · D.N.M.
No. 449, 996 F.2d at 1043, a plaintiff must establish an affirmative link between the Defendants’ conduct and the alleged constitutional violations of their subordinates by alleging the Defendants’ direct participation, their exercise of control or direction, or their failure to supervise, see Serna v. Colo. Dep’t of Corr., 455 F.3d at 1152.
Rule Authority · D. Kan.
No. 449 of Leavenworth Cty., Kan. 996 F.2d 1035, 1041 (10th Cir.1993); Stewart v. Bd. of Comm’rs for Shawnee County, Kan., 320 F.Supp.2d 1143, 1151 (D.Kan.2004). 42 .
Rule Authority · D. Kan.
No. 449 of Leavenworth County, Kan., 996 F.2d 1035, 1041 (10th Cir.1993); Henderson v. Montgomery County, Kansas, Bd. of County Com’rs, 213 F.Supp.2d 1262 1276 (D.Kan.2002). 23 .
Rule Authority · D. Mass.
No. 449 of Leavenworth, Kan., 996 F.2d 1035, 1041 (10th Cir.1993). *178 With respect to the first element, the law is well-settled that “a single incident” of misconduct, without more, “cannot provide the basis for municipal liability under § 1983.” Bordanaro v. McLeod, 871 F.2d 1151 , 1161 n. 8 (1st Cir.1989).
Rule Authority · D. Colo.
Gates, 996 F.2d at 1041.
Rule Authority · D. Colo.
The City may only be liable under § 1983 if the City's official policy-was the "moving force” behind a constitutional violation, citing Gates v. Unified School District, 996 F.2d at 1041. 3 .
Rule Authority · D. Colo.
No. 449, 996 F.2d at 1041.
Rule Authority · W.D. Okla.
Id. at 1041.
Cited · D. Kan. · signal: see
See id.
Cited · N.D. Ill. · signal: see
See Gates v. Unified School District No. 449, 996 F.2d 1035 , 1043 (10th Cir.1993).