How cited: Fmc Corporation v. Aero Industries, Inc. · Go Syfert

Fmc Corporation v. Aero Industries, Inc. (1993)

green · 104 citation events across 26 courts. Showing the 33 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199320092026
Rule Authority · SCOTUS · 4 citations in this opinion
As the Tenth Circuit observed, the American rule set out in Alyeska does not govern such fees "because they are not incurred in pursuing litigation." FMC Corp. v. Aero Industries, Inc. , 998 F. 2d 842, 847 (1993).
Rule Authority · 10th Cir. · 3 citations in this opinion
FMC Corp., 998 F.2d at 847.
Rule Authority · 10th Cir. · 3 citations in this opinion
FMC Corp., 998 F.2d at 847. 19 Koch complains the district court erred by allocating remediation costs based solely on the duration of Refinery operations under Koch's ownership relative to the thirty-seven-year period between 1946 and 1983.
Rule Authority · 10th Cir. · 3 citations in this opinion
FMC Corp., 998 F.2d at 847. 17 Koch complains the district court erred by allocating remediation costs based solely on Koch's relative duration of Refinery ownership during the thirty-seven-year period between 1946 and 1983.
green Young v. United States (2005)
Rule Authority · 10th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
To establish a prima facie case under § 107(a), a plaintiff must prove (1) the site is a facility, (2) defendant is a responsible person, (3) the release or threatened release of a hazardous substance has occurred, and (4) the release or threatened release caused the plaintiff to incur necessary response costs consistent with the National Contingency Plan (NCP). 3 FMC, 998 F.2d at 845.
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
Bd. of Agric., 998 F.2d 842, 828 (10th Cir. 1993); Cohen v. Brown Univ., 991 F.2d 888, 897-98 (1st Cir. 1993)). 6 In order to effectively accommodate the athletic interests of both male and female students, the University had three options under the policy interpretations of Title IX promulgated by the Office of Civil Rights: (1) provide participation opportunities for men and women that are substantially proportionate to their respective rates of enrollment as full-time und…
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
Corp., 53 F.3d 930, 937 (8th Cir.1995); Witco Corp. v. Beekhuis, 38 F.3d 682, 692 (3d Cir.1994); FMC Corp. v. Aero Industries, Inc., 998 F.2d 842, 846 (10th Cir.1993); United States v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Co., supra, 810 F.2d at 743 .
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
FMC Corp. v. Aero Industries, Inc., 998 F.2d 842, 845 (10th Cir.1993). 52 The unions argue that they construed the amendment to the pretrial order as simply saying that it was a legal issue for the district judge to decide whether the procedure described in the amendment should be followed.
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
FMC Corp. v. Aero Industries, Inc., 998 F.2d 842, 845 (10th Cir.1993).
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
The court simply ruled litigation fees were not recoverable while nonliti-gation fees necessary to the cleanup were recoverable. 998 F.2d at 847.
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
The court simply ruled litigation fees were not recoverable while nonlitigation fees necessary to the cleanup were recoverable. 998 F.2d at 847.
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Fees such as these are recoverable "because they are not incurred in pursuing litigation," Key Tronic, --- U.S. at ----, 114 S.Ct. at 1967 (quoting FMC Corp. v. Aero Industries, Inc., 998 F.2d 842, 847 (10th Cir.1993)), and "benefit[ ] the entire cleanup effort and serve[ ] a statutory purpose apart from the reallocation of costs." Ibid.
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Fees such as these are recoverable "because they are not incurred in pursuing litigation,” Key Tronic,-U.S. at-, 114 S.Ct. at 1967 (quoting FMC Corp. v. Aero Industries, Inc., 998 F.2d 842, 847 (10th Cir.1993)), and "benefit[ ] the entire cleanup effort and serve[ ] a statutory purpose apart from ’the reallocation of costs." Ibid.
Rule Authority · D. Kan. · 4 citations in this opinion
“A district court has considerable discretion in apportioning equitable shares of response costs.” FMC Corp. v. Aero Indus., Inc., 998 F.2d 842, 846 (10th Cir.1993).
Quote Authority · D. Colo. · signal: see also · 3 citations in this opinion
Lansford-Coaldale, 4 F.3d at 1221 ; see also FMC, 998 F.2d at 846 (“Actual control and personal participation in the wrongful conduct clearly makes one an operator under CERCLA.”); U.S. v. Kayser-Roth Corp., 910 F.2d 24, 27 (1st Cir.1990) (holding that to be an operator, a parent corporation must, at a minimum, be actively involved in its subsidiary’s activities); Mathews v. Dow Chem.
“Actual control and personal participation in the wrongful conduct clearly makes one an operator under CERCLA.”
Rule Authority · D.N.J. · 2 citations in this opinion
The Court adopts the Tenth Circuit’s view that nonlitigation attorneys’ fees may be recoverable if “neces-. sary to the containment and cleanup of hazardous releases.” Id. at 848. 79.
Rule Authority · D.N.M.
FMC Corp. v. Aero Industries, Inc., 998 F.2d 842, 846 (10th Cir. 1993).
Rule Authority · W.D. Wis.
Corp., 53 F.3d 930, 937 (8th Cir.1995); Witco Corp. v. Beckhuis, 38 F.3d 682, 692 (3d Cir.1994); FMC Corp. v. Aero Industries, Inc., 998 F.2d 842, 846 (10th Cir.1993); United States v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Co., 810 F.2d 726, 743 (7th Cir.1986)).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Thus, CERCLA “encourages private parties to assume the financial responsibility of cleanup by allowing them to seek recovery from others.” Young, 394 F.3d at 862 (quoting FMC Corp. v. Aero Industries, Inc., 998 F.2d 842, 847 (10th Cir.1993)).
Rule Authority · D. Kan.
Ultimately, “[t]he court must balance the equities in light of the totality of the circumstances.” FMC Corp., 998 F.2d at 847.
Rule Authority · D. Colo.
FMC Corp. v. Aero Industries, Inc., 998 F.2d 842, 846 (10th Cir.1993); United States v. R.W.
Rule Authority · D. Kan.
Id. at 848. *1324 FMC Corp. governs the court’s decision.
Rule Authority · D. Kan.
FMC Corp. v. Aero Industries, Inc., 998 F.2d 842, 847-48 (10th Cir.1993).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Syms v. Olin Corp., 408 F.3d 95 , 106 n. 8 (2d Cir.2005) (observing that “the combination of Cooper Industries and Bedford Affiliates ... would create a perverse incentive for PRPs to wait until they are sued before incurring response costs”). 10 This would undercut one of CERCLA’s main goals, “ ‘encouraging] private parties to assume the financial responsibility of cleanup by allowing them to seek recovery from others.’ ” Key Tronic Corp. v. United States, 511 U.S. 809
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See FMC Corp. v. Aero Indus., Inc., 998 F.2d 842 , 845 (10th Cir.1993) (holding that a party waived his right’ to a jury trial by signing the proposed pretrial *415 order designating the case for a nonjury trial); see also Lampkin v. Int’l Union, 154 F.3d 1136 , 1147 (10th Cir.1998) (“A party who stipulates in the pretrial order to submission of an issue to the court has waived the right to a jury determination of the issue.”).
green Acushnet v. Brittany (1999)
Cited · 1st Cir. · signal: accord
Accord FMC Corp. v. Aero Indus., Inc., 998 F.2d 842 , 846-47 (10th Cir. 1993); Environmental Transp.
Cited · 1st Cir. · signal: accord
Accord FMC Corp. v. Aero Indus., Inc., 998 F.2d 842 , 846-47 (10th Cir.1993); Environmental Transp.
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See id. at 847; United States v. R.W.
green Hull v. Feinstein (2002)
Cited (see also) · N.M. Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., FMC Corp. v. Aero Indus., Inc., 998 F.2d 842 , 845 (10th Cir.1993) (holding that pro se party waived right to jury trial by signing pretrial order and participating in bench trial without objection); White v. McGinnis, 903 F.2d 699, 700 (9th Cir.1990) (holding that “knowing participation in a bench trial without objection constitutes waiver of a timely jury demand”). {10} In concluding that conduct may constitute waiver, the federal courts have rejected a formalis…
Cited (see also) · W.D.N.Y. · signal: see also
See also, FMC Corp. v. Aero Industries, Inc., 998 F.2d 842, 846 (10th Cir.1993); United States v. Carolina Transformer Co., 978 F.2d 832, 836-37 (4th Cir.1992).
Cited (see also) · D.N.J. · signal: see also
See also FMC Aero Indus., Inc., 998 F.2d 842 , 845 (10th Cir.1993) (after demanding jury trial in CERCLA cost recovery action, "party waived any right .. to a jury trial by signing the pretrial order [which stated that trial would be non-jury] and participating in the bench trial"); White v. McGinnis, 903 F.2d 699, 703 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 903 , 111 S.Ct. 266 , 112 L.Ed.2d 223 (1990).
Cited (see also) · E.D.N.Y · signal: compare
Compare FMC Corporation v. Aero Industries, Inc., 998 F.2d 842 (10th Cir.1993) (holding the a party entitled to response costs under section 107(a)(4)(B) may not recover attorneys’ fees arising out of litigation to recover response costs); In re Hemingway Transport, Inc., 993 F.2d 915, 934 (1st Cir.1993) (same); Key Tronic Corp., 984 F.2d at 1027 (declining to award attorneys’ fees under section 107(a)(4)(B) of CERCLA); Stanton Road Associates, 984 F.2d at 1017-20 (same) wit…
green Cluster 2527
Cited (see also) · signal: see also
Edison v. UGI *89 Utils., Inc., 423 F.3d 90, 94 (2d Cir.2005) (second alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Key Tronic Corp. v. United States, 511 U.S. 809 , 819 n. 13, 114 S.Ct. 1960 , 128 L.Ed.2d 797 (1994) (“ ‘CERCLA is designed to encourage private parties to assume the financial responsibility of cleanup by allowing them to seek recovery from others.’ ” (quoting FMC Corp. v. Aero Indus., Inc., 998 F.2d 842 , 847 (10th Cir.1993))).