How cited: Gonzalez v. Bank of America Insurance Services, Inc. · Go Syfert

Gonzalez v. Bank of America Insurance Services, Inc. (2011)

green · 19 citation events across 8 courts. Showing the 12 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Servs., Inc., 454 F. App’x 295, 298 (5th Cir. 2011) (alteration in original) (quoting U.S. ex rel.
alteration in original
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Servs., Inc., 454 Fed.Appx. 295, 299-300 (5th Cir.2011) (unpublished). 8 .
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Servs., Inc., 454 F. App’x 295, 301 (5th Cir. 2011) (finding “no evidence or allegation” suggesting that the parent company had “any greater influence over [its subsidiary] than would be normal for a significant shareholder in a company”); see also Edwards v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 18-138, 2019 WL 1061670 , at *2 (N.D.
finding “no evidence or allegation” suggesting that the parent company had “any greater influence over [its subsidiary] than would be normal for a significant shareholder in a company”
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Servs., Inc., 454 F. App'x 295, 299 (5th Cir. 2011) (affirming dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction as a preliminary matter for failure to present a prima facie case). 3 Because Plaintiff asserts claims under Louisiana Products Liability Act, the Court uses the Louisiana test as directed under Adm'rs of Tulane Educ.
affirming dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction as a preliminary matter for failure to present a prima facie case
Rule Authority · S.D. Miss.
Services, Inc., 454 F. App’x 295, 301 (5th Cir. 2011) (finding dismissal under Rule 9(b) appropriate where the “amended complaint contains almost no allegations about events or actions affecting [the plaintiff].”); see also Herrman Holdings Ltd. v. Lucent Technologies Inc., 302 F.3d 552, 566 (5th Cir. 2002) (“[D]istrict court did not err in dismissing [plaintiffs’] securities fraud claim for failure to plead fraud with particularity.”).
finding dismissal under Rule 9(b) appropriate where the “amended complaint contains almost no allegations about events or actions affecting [the plaintiff].”
Rule Authority · N.D. Tex.
Ins, Servs, Inc., 454 F. App’x 295, 298 (5th Cir. 2011) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Servs., Inc., 454 Fed.Appx. 295, 300 (5th Cir. 2011), citing Stroman Realty, Inc. v. Antt, 528 F.3d 382, 385 (5th Cir. 2008).
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Servs., Inc., 454 Fed.Appx. 295, 299-300 (5th Cir.2011), citing Stroman Realty, Inc. v. Antt, 528 F.3d 382, 385 (5th Cir.2008).
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Servs., 454 Fed.Appx. 295, 302 (5th Cir.2011) (the Fifth Circuit upholds “the denial of leave to amend where the party seeking leave to amend has not clearly established that he could not reasonably have raised the new matter prior to the trial court’s merits”).
green Clemons v. WPRJ, LLC (2013)
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Servs., Inc., 454 Fed.Appx. 295, 299-300 (5th Cir.2011), citing Stroman Realty, Inc. v. Antt, 528 F.3d 382, 385 (5th Cir.2008).
Rule Authority · W.D. Tex.
Servs., Inc., 454 Fed.Appx. 295, 298 (5th Cir.2011); United States ex rel.
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Servs., Inc., 454 Fed.Appx. 295, 299-300 (5th Cir.2011), citing Stroman Realty, Inc. v. Antt, 528 F.3d 382, 385 (5th Cir.2008).