Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2012)
green
· 15 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 6 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
Reg. Comm’n v. FERC, 668 F.3d 735, 736 (D.C.Cir.2012) (citing 16 U.S.C. § 2642 ).
Regulatory Comm’n v. FERC, 668 F.3d 735, 739 (D.C.
quoting Allegheny Power v. FERC, 437 F.3d 1215, 1220 (D.C. Cir. 2006)
Regulatory Comm’n v. FERC, 668 F.3d 735, 740 (D.C.Cir.2012), and the Commission explains in the challenged orders that Order No. 681 did not establish that Section 217(b)(4) creates a preference for load-serving entities in the “broader context of planning new transmission capacity.” Order 1000-A ¶ 171, 77 Fed.Reg. at 32,213 (emphasis added).
green
Electric Power Supply Assoc. v. FERC (2014)
Reg. Comm’n v. FERC, 668 F.3d 735, 736 (D.C.
citing 16 U.S.C. § 2642
Comm’n v. FERC, 668 F.3d 735, 736-37 (D.C.
green
Zhaoqing Tifo New Fibre Co. v. United States (2015)
See, e.g., Indiana Utility Regulatory Comm’n v. FERC, 668 F.3d 735, 739 (D.C.Cir.2012) (acknowledging exception to doctrine of exhaustion “when an agency has considered the argument at the urging of another party”); Kessler v. Surface Transportation Board, 635 F.3d 1, 8 (D.C.Cir.2011) (recognizing exception to exhaustion doctrine allowing a plaintiff to “raise [in litigation] any issue raised by any party to the administrative proceeding”); Portland General Electric Co. v. B…