How cited: Naomi Aylward v. Selecthealth, Inc. · Go Syfert

Naomi Aylward v. Selecthealth, Inc. (2022)

green · 20 citation events across 8 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2023 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
202320242026
Quote Authority · W.D. Ky. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., Aylward v. SelectHealth, Inc., 35 F.4th 673, 681 (9th Cir. 2022) (“applicable state consumer protection laws and common law claims can fall within the ambit of Part C’s preemption provision”); Williams v. Allegheny, 2023 WL 4238892 , at *8 (“The language any State law or regulation’—with no qualifying provisions—reflects an intent to include common law claims”) (internal quotations omitted); Alston v. United Healthcare Servs., Inc., 291 F. Supp. 3d 1170 , 1173–75 …
“applicable state consumer protection laws and common law claims can fall within the ambit of Part C’s preemption provision”
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill. · 2 citations in this opinion
Cal. Mar. 28, 2025) (quoting Aylward v. SelectHealth, Inc., 35 F.4th 673, 681 (9th Cir. 2022)); see also Rudek, 2014 WL 5441845 , at *4 (observing that the Medicare Act’s “preemption provision applies to ‘any’ state law or regulation, not just those that are inconsistent with federal standards”).
Quote Authority · S.D. Ohio · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Aylward v. SelectHealth, Inc., 35 F.4th 673, 680 (9th Cir. 2022) (“The plain language of the provision thus provides that, in order to determine whether a claim is preempted, we must identify whether there is a relevant ‘standard[ ] established under [Part C]’ with preemptive effect.”).
“The plain language of the provision thus provides that, in order to determine whether a claim is preempted, we must identify whether there is a relevant ‘standard[ ] established under [Part C]’ with preemptive effect.”
Rule Authority · D. Idaho
Aylward v. SelectHealth, Inc., 35 F.4th 673, 681 (9th Cir. 2022).2 Determining whether the Director’s actions are preempted, then, requires a two-step analysis.
Rule Authority · D. Idaho
Aylward v. SelectHealth, Inc., 35 F.4th 673, 681 (9th Cir. 2022).
Rule Authority · Cal.
(See, e.g., Hernandez, supra, 58 F.4th at pp. 11–13; Aylward v. SelectHealth, Inc. (9th Cir. 2022) 35 F.4th 673, 681 (Aylward); Pharm.