Stevens v. Drugg (1943)

green · 35 citation events across 15 courts. Showing the 10 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 10

Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

195819922026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Jelmoli Holding, Inc. v. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. (2006)

Rule Authority · 1st Cir.

Whether, if there had been no ‘subrogation agreements,’ the equitable doctrine of subrogation of an insurer who is an indemnitor would have produced substantially the same result we need not consider.” Id. at 973. 5 *21 In Blue Cross of Mass., Inc. v. Travaline, 398 Mass. 582 , 499 N.E.2d 1195 (1986), the same court distinguished General Exchange, noting that no portion of the settlement paid to the attorney was earmarked as funds payable to the insurer’s subrogation claim.

green Ward v. Allied Van Lines, Inc. (2000)

Rule Authority · 4th Cir.

Corp. v. Driscoll, 315 Mass. 360 , 52 N.E.2d 970, 973 (1944); 16 Couch on Ins. § 60:41.

green Michael A. Ward Kimberly Ward v. Allied Van Lines, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation Academy, Incorporated… (2000)

Rule Authority · 4th Cir.

Corp. v. Driscoll, 52 N.E.2d 970, 973 (Mass. 1944); 16 Couch on Ins. § 60:41. 11 The related rights of subrogation and reimbursement serve to protect the insurer.

green United States v. Lee A. Limbs, Jr. (1975)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir.

Corp. v. Driscoll, 315 Mass. 360, 365 , 52 N.E.2d 970, 973 (1944).

green Hedgebeth v. Medford (1977)

Rule Authority · N.J. · 2 citations in this opinion

Corp. v. Driscoll, 315 Mass. 360 , 52 N.E. 2d 970, 973 (1944); National Union Fire Ins.

green Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Smith (1999)

Rule Authority · Cal. Ct. App.

The General Exchange court hinted that the attorney’s claim might have priority over the insurer’s (see General Exchange, supra, 52 N.E.2d at p. 973 [amount due insurer “may well be less” than full reimbursement amount because “of necessary and reasonable expenses and perhaps also attorney’s fees”]), but that possibility undercuts the idea of a preexisting lien which the Aguiluz case seemed to assume.

green Roberts v. Total Health Care, Inc. (1998)

Rule Authority · Md.

Corp. v. Driscoll, 315 Mass. 360, 364-365 , 52 N.E.2d 970, 973 (1944) (insurance company was subrogated to an insured’s cause of action for property damage to the insured’s car, and therefore had the “right to receive the proceeds” of any cause of action for that property damage; insured’s attorney held liable to insurer for distribut *519 ing settlement proceeds to the insured which were specifically marked as being for property damage).

green LaBarre v. Gold (1987)

Rule Authority · Miss.

General Exchange Insurance Corp. v. Driscoll, 52 N.E.2d 970, 973 (Mass. 1944).

green Ortiz v. Great Southern Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. (1980)

Rule Authority · Tex.

Corp. v. Driscoll, 315 Mass. 360 , 52 N.E.2d 970, 973 (1944).

green Klacik v. Kovacs (1970)

Rule Authority · N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.

Corporation v. Driscoll, 315 Mass. 360 , 52 N.E. 2d 970, 973 (Sup. Jud.