Craft v. Kane (2001)
green
· 43 citation events
across 6 courts.
Showing the 16 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200120132026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Santander Bank, N.A. v. Warrender (2014)
Avionics, Inc. v. City of Westfield, 63 Mass.App.Ct. 509 , 827 N.E.2d 721, 725 (2005); see also Craft v. Kane, 51 Mass.App.Ct. 648 , 747 N.E.2d 748, 752 (2001) (“[T]he stipulation of dismissal constituted a judgment within the meaning of the attorney’s lien statute.”).
“[T]he stipulation of dismissal constituted a judgment within the meaning of the attorney’s lien statute.”
green
Northeastern Avionics, Inc. v. City of Westfield (2005)
Co., Heath Properties v. Credle, 427 Mass. 636, 640 (1998); (2) the attorney appeared for the chent in that action, Boswell v. Zephyr Lines, Inc., 414 Mass. at 244, 249 ; (3) a court entered a judgment, decree, or order in that action, Craft v. Kane, 51 Mass. App. Ct. 648, 651 (2001); (4) the judgment, decree, or order was favorable to the attorney’s chent, Cohen v. Lindsey, 38 Mass. App. Ct. at 4 ; and (5) proceeds were derived from that judgment, decree, or order.
green
Skellinger v. Herbert (2001)
Cf. Craft v. Kane, 51 Mass.App.Ct. 648, 651 (2001) (concluding that a stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Rule 41 constitutes an order “in the client’s favor” under G.L.c. 221, §50, the attorney’s lien statute, where the client receives a monetary settlement in connection with the dismissal).
concluding that a stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Rule 41 constitutes an order “in the client’s favor” under G.L.c. 221, §50, the attorney’s lien statute, where the client receives a monetary settlement in connection with the dismissal
green
Malonis v. Loiselle (2003)
Salem Realty; Opert v. Mellios, 415 Mass. 634, 636 (1993) (both noting, but not deciding, the issue of whether an attorney discharged in bad faith might recover from his client on a contingent fee agreement); Craft v. Kane, 51 Mass.App.Ct. 648, 653 (2002).
Co., 427 Mass. at 641 (attorney's lien attaching to funds held in escrow); Craft v. Kane, 51 Mass. App. Ct. 648, 653 (2001) (attorney's lien attaching to a $7,500 stipulation of dismissal that was paid to plaintiff); see also Curly Customs, Inc., 62 Mass. App. Ct. at 97-98 (motion to determine an attorney's lien is premature until a party has prevailed and there are proceeds to which the lien can attach).
attorney's lien attaching to a $7,500 stipulation of dismissal that was paid to plaintiff
green
Doe v. Gonpo (2023)
L. c. 221, § 50 ("[f]rom the authorized commencement of an action . . . the attorney who appears for a client in such proceeding shall have a lien"), and is consistent with case law holding that an attorney's lien arises upon the commencement of an action,9 see Craft v. Kane, 51 Mass. App. Ct. 648, 650-651 (2001) (treating notice of lien, filed after attorney withdrew from case, as dating back to commencement of suit); Hayes v. Department of Revenue, 44 Mass. App. Ct. 905, 9…
treating notice of lien, filed after attorney withdrew from case, as dating back to commencement of suit
green
Reznik v. Yelton (2011)
Upon the parties’ filing of their joint stipulation of dismissal, the dismissal became the final judgment in this case, Craft v. Kane, 51 Mass. App. Ct. 648, 651-652 (2001), akin to a consent judgment or agreement for judgment, and fully binding on the parties and conclusive of their rights.
green
Blazar v. Sneider (2008)
“A client’s discharge of an attorney ends the attorney’s right to recover on the contract of employment and, thereafter, an attorney can recover only for the reasonable value of his services on the basis of quantum meruit . . . [However, a court] might permit an attorney to recover under a contingent fee contract on a showing of substantial performance, bad faith termination by the client, and other factors . . .” Craft v. Kane, 51 Mass.App.Ct. 648, 653 (2001), quoting Opert…
A judge of the Superior Court (not the motion judge here) denied the motion after concluding that “no statutory basis exists to enforce any lien.” On Kerlinsky, P.C.’s, appeal, this court vacated the order on the authority of Craft v. Kane, 51 Mass. App. Ct. 648, 652-653 (2001), and remanded the case because the judge erred in failing to recognize that a stipulation of dismissal constitutes a judgment within the meaning of the attorney’s lien statute.
green
Griffith & Associates, PLLC v. Malouf, Inc. (2005)
See, e.g., Craft v. Kane, 51 Mass.App.Ct. 648, 653 (2001) (“the lien attached to the $7,500 arising under the stipulation of dismissal”).
“the lien attached to the $7,500 arising under the stipulation of dismissal”
Craft v. Kane, 51 Mass. App. Ct. 648, 653 (2001).
green
Craft v. Kane (2004)
Craft v. Kane, 51 Mass.App.Ct. 648, 653-54 (2001).
green
John G. Marchand v. Jaclyn Santoro. (2026)
See Craft v. Kane, 51 Mass. App. Ct. 648, 652 (2001).
green
Ropes & Gray, LLP v. Jalbert (In Re Engage Inc.) (2005)
See, e.g., Craft v. Kane, 51 Mass.App.Ct. 648, 653 , 747 N.E.2d 748 (Mass.App.Ct.2001) (holding that "[bjecause G.L. c. 221, § 50 expressly refers to judgments 'entered or made,’ the stipulation of dismissal constituted a judgment within the meaning of the attorney’s lien statute”); Phalon v. Technical Communications Corp., No. 9802553, 1999 WL 1326754 , at *1, *3 (Mass.Super.Feb.26, 1999). 8 .
See Craft v. Kane, 51 Mass. App. Ct. 648, 653 (2001).