How cited: Tipton v. University Of Hawaii · Go Syfert

Tipton v. University Of Hawaii (1994)

green · 46 citation events across 10 courts. Showing the 15 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199420102026
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Tipton v. University of Hawaii, 15 F.3d 922, 923 (9th Cir.1994).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Tipton v. University of Hawaii, 15 F.3d 922, 923 (9th Cir.1994).
Rule Authority · D.D.C. · 2 citations in this opinion
In Tipton, the Ninth Circuit upheld the University of Hawaii’s policy not to grant any funds ‘“that are intended to or actually benefit any sectarian program or activity of a [University Registered Organization (“URO”) ].’ ” Tipton, 15 F.3d at 924.
Rule Authority · E.D. Cal.
Florer, 639 15 F.3d at 922. 16 III.
Rule Authority · E.D. Cal.
Surprise 13 Under California law, “[s]urprise involves the extent to which the contract clearly 14 discloses its terms as well as the reasonable expectations of the weaker party.” Chavarria, 733 15 F.3d at 922 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
internal quotation marks and citation omitted
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.
Id. at 927 (internal quotation marks omitted). .
internal quotation marks omitted
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Tipton v. University of Haw., 15 F.3d 922 , 925 (9th Cir.1994) (stating that district court's judgment may be affirmed on any ground fairly supported by record)
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Tipton v. University of Hawaii, 15 F.3d 922 , 925 (9th Cir.1994) (court of appeals may affirm district court's judgment on any ground supported by record)
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Tipton v. University of Hawaii, 15 F.3d 922 , 925 (9th Cir.1994) (court of appeals may affirm district court's judgment on any ground supported by record) 4 In his notice of appeal, Andrakin indicated that he also was appealing the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 motion to amend the judgment.
Cited · S.D. Cal. · signal: see
See Hal Roach Studios, Inc., 896 F.2d at 1550 , and see Fleming v. Pickard, 581 15 F.3d 922 , 925 (9th Cir. 2009).
Cited · D. Nev. · signal: accord
See 13 Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471 (9th Cir. 1986) (“Eitel apparently fails to understand the 14 two-step process required by Rule 55.”); accord Symantec Corp. v. Global Impact, Inc., 559 15 F.3d 922 , 923 (9th Cir. 2009) (noting that Rule 55(a) and (b) provide a two-step process for 16 obtaining a default judgment); see also Norman v. Small, No. 09-cv-2235, 2010 WL 5173683 , 17 at *2 (S.D.
noting that Rule 55(a) and (b) provide a two-step process for 16 obtaining a default judgment
Cited · S.D. Cal. · signal: see
See id. at 926. 18 As for the first consideration, if a defendant has received actual or constructive 19 notice of the filing of the action and intentionally failed to answer, its conduct is culpable. 20 Franchise Holding II, 375 F.3d at 926. “[I]n this context the term ‘intentionally’ means 21 that a movant cannot be treated as culpable simply for having made a conscious choice not 22 to answer; rather, to treat a failure to answer as culpable, the movant must have acted wi…
Cited (see also) · D.D.C. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Tipton v. Univ. of Hawaii, 15 F.3d 922 , 927 (9th Cir.1994)).
Cited (see also) · D.D.C. · signal: see, e.g.
See e.g., Tipton v. Univ. of Hawaii, 15 F.3d 922 , 927 (9th Cir.1994); Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 , 6 S.Ct. 1064 , 30 L.Ed. 220 (1886).
Cited · N.D. Cal. · signal: see
See Tipton v. Univ. of Haw., 15 F.3d 922 , 925 (9th Cir.1994).