State v. Evensen (2019)
green
· 39 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 3 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2019 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201920222026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Lyons v. Betts (2024)
Rather, Defendant contends Plaintiff 23 recorded these conversations without Defendant’s consent, (Id.), and, accordingly, 24 violated O.R.S. § 165.540, which prohibits, in relevant part, “obtain[ing] . . . any 25 part of a conversation by means of any device . . . if not all participants in the 26 conversation are specifically informed their conversation is being obtained.” See 27 also State v. Evensen, 447 P.3d 23 , 27–28 (Or.
“The prohibition 28 against surreptitiously ‘obtaining’ a conversation includes surreptitiously recording 1 it.”
green
State v. Etzel (2021)
Interviewing a 12-year-old was “definitely a lot easier in [her] opinion.” Id. at 312 (brackets in origi- nal).
brackets in origi- nal
green
State v. Redman (2025)
The testimony was not “expressly presented to the jury as Cite as 338 Or App 384 (2025) 393 scientifically grounded.” State v. Henley, 363 Or 284, 301 , 422 P3d 217 (2018); see also State v. Evensen, 298 Or App 294, 317 , 447 P3d 23 , rev den, 366 Or 64 (2019) (rejecting an argument that testimony was scientific in part because it was not presented to the jury in that manner).
rejecting an argument that testimony was scientific in part because it was not presented to the jury in that manner