United States v. Gary Lee Wickham (1994)

United States v. Nash, 946 F.2d 679, 680 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 Under the Act, a defendant who pleads not guilty must be tried "within seventy days from the filing date ... of the information or indictment, or from the date the defendant has appeared before a judicial officer of the court in which such charge is pending, whichever date last occurs." United States v. Wickham, 30 F.3d 1252, 1254 (9th Cir. 1994) (citing 18 U.S.C.

LAYFIELD 9 in § 3161(h)(1)(F) applies to the seventy-day period of § 3161(c)(1)”); cf. United States v. Wickham, 30 F.3d 1252, 1254-55 (9th Cir. 1994) (adhering to the statute’s “plain meaning” in rejecting the argument that § 3161(i) “replace[s] section 3161(c)(1) when a defendant withdraws a guilty plea”).

See, e.g., United States v. Walker, 255 F.3d 540, 542 (8th Cir. 2001); United States v. Lainez-Leiva, 129 F.3d 89, 91 (2nd Cir. 1997); United States v. Guzman, 85 F.3d 823 , 829 n. 4 (1st Cir. 1996); United States v. Wickham, 30 F.3d 1252, 1255 (9th Cir. 1994); United States v. Dawn, 900 F.2d 1132, 1135-36 (7th Cir. 1990); United States v. Anderton, 752 F.2d 1005, 1008 (5th Cir. 1985).

See, e.g., United States v. Walker, 255 F.3d 540, 542 (8th Cir. 2001); United States v. Lainez-Leiva, 129 F.3d 89, 91 (2nd Cir. 1997); United States v. Guzman, 85 F.3d 823 , 829 n. 4 (1st Cir. 1996); United States v. Wickham, 30 F.3d 1252, 1255 (9th Cir. 1994); United States v. Dawn, 900 F.2d 1132, 1135-36 (7th Cir. 1990); United States v. Anderton, 752 F.2d 1005, 1008 (5th Cir. 1985).

See, e.g., United States v. Walker, 255 F.3d 540, 542 (8th Cir.2001); United States v. Lainez-Leiva, 129 F.3d 89, 91 (2nd Cir. 1997); United States v. Guzman, 85 F.3d 823, 829 n. 4 (1st Cir.1996); United States v. Wickham, 30 F.3d 1252, 1255 (9th Cir. 1994); United States v. Dawn, 900 F.2d 1132, 1135-36 (7th Cir.1990); United States v. Anderton, 752 F.2d 1005, 1008 (5th Cir.1985).

In United States v. Wickham, 30 F.3d 1252, 1254 (9th Cir.1994), we noted that the effect of § 3161® on the application of § 3161(c)(1) “is simply to substitute an artificial indictment date for the actual indictment date when calculating the seventy-day period for a defendant who pleads not guilty.” “Section 3161® does not replace section 3161(c)(1) when a defendant withdraws a guilty plea; it merely reestablishes the indictment date for the purposes of section 3161.” Id.

Section 3161(i) does not replace section 3161(c)(1)' when a defendant withdraws a guilty plea; it merely reestablishes the indictment date for the purposes of section 3161.” United States v. Wickham, 30 F.3d 1252, 1254 (9th Cir.1994). *362 The District Court and the defendant also rely on United States v. Bigler, 810 F.2d 1317 (5th Cir.1987).

See United States v. Guzman, 85 F.3d 823 , 829 n. 4 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 537 , 136 L.Ed.2d 422 (1996); United States v. Wickham, 30 F.3d 1252, 1255 (9th Cir.1994); United States v. Dawn, 900 F.2d 1132, 1135-36 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 498 U.S. 949 , 111 S.Ct. 368 , 112 L.Ed.2d 330 (1990); United States v. Stoner, 799 F.2d 1253, 1257 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1021 , 107 S.Ct. 678 , 93 L.Ed.2d 729 (1986); United States v. Valentine, 783 F.2d …

United States v. Wickham, 30 F.3d 1252, 1253 (9th Cir.1994).

See United States v. Wickham, 30 F.3d 1252 , 1253–54 (9th Cir. 1994) (concluding in a case similar to ours—the defendant obtained a transfer, pleaded guilty, but then withdrew the guilty plea—that the transferor court was the one in which charges were pending for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (c)(1)); United States v. Young, 814 F.3d 392, 395 (7th Cir. 1987) (concluding in a case like ours—the defendant obtained a transfer but didn’t plead guilty—that the transferee court was…

See, e.g., United States v. Wickham, 30 F.3d 1252, 1254 (9th Cir.1994) (holding that even though the defendant was deemed indicted on February 12, 1992, while in Texas, when the defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea was granted, his STA period only began on April 21, 1992, when he first appeared in court in California in the district in which the indictment was pending); United States v. Thirion, 813 F.2d 146 , 153 (8th Cir.1987) (holding that, although the defendan…

See United States v. Wickham, 30 F.3d 1252 , ___ _____________ _______ 1255 (9th Cir. 1994); United States v. Dawn, 900 F.2d 1132 , 1135- _____________ ____ 36 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 949 (1990); United States _____ ______ _____________ v. Anderton, 752 F.2d 1005, 1008 (5th Cir. 1985). ________ 5As an initial matter, we note that the appellant did not raise the issue of the government's alleged breach before the district court.

See United States v. Wickham, 30 F.3d 1252, 1255 (9th Cir.1994); United States v. Dawn, 900 F.2d 1132, 1135-36 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 949 , 111 S.Ct. 368 , 112 L.Ed.2d 330 (1990); United States v. Anderton, 752 F.2d 1005, 1008 (5th Cir.1985). 5 .