How cited: Wardlaw Farms, Inc. v. United States · Go Syfert

Wardlaw Farms, Inc. v. United States (1994)

green · 3 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 2 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.
See, e.g., Sieben v. United States, 108 Fed.Cl. 1, 5 (2012) (reviewing military pay claim under deferential “arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law, or unsupported by substantial evidence”); White & Case LLP v. United States, 89 Fed.Cl. 12, 19 (2009) (review claims brought under moiety statute, 19 U.S.C. § 1619 (c) under deferential “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, otherwise not in accordance with law, procedurally defective, or unsupported by evidence in the …
reviewing final agency action under “rationality” test, “rather than ‘de novo’ review of a breach of contract claim”
green Vandervelde v. Espy (1995)
Cited (see also) · D.D.C. · signal: see also
See also Wardlaw Farms, Inc. v. United States, 32 Fed.Cl. 475 (Ct.Cl.1992).