E.W. Bliss Co. v. United States (1995)

green · 61 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 25 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 25

Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

199520102026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Software Engineering Services, Corp. v. United States (2009)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl. · 2 citations in this opinion

Bliss Company v. United States, stated that a technical evaluation was proper even if the agency did not reference certain portions of the plaintiffs proposal. 33 Fed.Cl. 123, 143 (1995), aff'd 77 F.3d 445 (1996).

green MTB Group, Inc. v. United States (2005)

Quote Authority · Fed. Cl. · 2 citations in this opinion

Bliss Co., 33 Fed.Cl. at 134 (“decisions by the Comptroller General have been accorded a high degree of deference by the courts, particularly those decisions involving bid protests”).

“decisions by the Comptroller General have been accorded a high degree of deference by the courts, particularly those decisions involving bid protests”

green Eagle Technologies, Inc. v. United States (2023)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.

green Frawner Corporation v. United States (2022)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.

green Leeward Construction, Inc v. United States (2022)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.

green Colonial Press International, Inc. v. United States (2013)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.

green Colonial Press International, Inc. v. United States (2013)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 123, 135 (1995), aff'd, 77 F.3d 445 (Fed.Cir.1996))); Univ.

green Caddell Construction Co., Inc. v. United States (2013)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 123, 135 (1995), aff'd, 77 F.3d 445 (Fed.Cir.1996))).

green One Largo Metro, Llc v. United States (2013)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 123, 135 (1995))); see also Kingdomware Techs., Inc. v. United States, 107 Fed.Cl. 226 , 230 n. 2 (2012) (quoting Centech Grp., Inc. v. United States, 554 F.3d 1029 , 1038 n. 4 (Fed.Cir.2009) (GAO decisions are not binding authority, but may be “instructive in the area of bid protests.”)).

green Glenn Defense Marine (Asia), PTE Ltd. v. United States (2011)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 123, 135 (1995), aff'd, 77 F.3d 445 (Fed.Cir.1996).

green SP Systems, Inc. v. United States (2009)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 123, 134-35 (1995), aff'd, 77 F.3d 445 (Fed.Cir.1996), “Honeywell cannot be read to supplant Burroughs, nor to confer on the GAO a degree of deference beyond that delimited in Burroughs.” This Court should not conduct a de novo review of the issues decided by the GAO, but instead may only inquire whether the GAO decision was rational and the agency justifiably relied upon it.

green Grunley Walsh International, LLC v. United States (2007)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 123, 135 (1995), aff'd 77 F.3d 445 (Fed.Cir.1996).

green NVT Technologies, Inc. v. United States (2006)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 123, 138-39 (1995). .

green United Enterprise & Associates v. United States (2006)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 123, 135 (1995), aff'd, 77 F.3d 445 (Fed.Cir.1996).

green J.C.N. Construction Co. v. United States (2004)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 123, 143 (1995) (interpreting an earlier version of the FAR and observing, “the applicable procurement regulations do not require the summary documents to include an evaluation of the respective proposals item by item”), aff'd, 77 F.3d 445 (Fed.Cir.1996).

interpreting an earlier version of the FAR and observing, “the applicable procurement regulations do not require the summary documents to include an evaluation of the respective proposals item by item”

green Hawaiian Dredging Construction Co. v. United States (2004)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 123, 135 (1995), aff'd, 77 F.3d 445 (Fed.Cir.1996).

green Colorado Construction Corp. v. United States (2003)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 123, 135 (1995), aff'd, 77 F.3d 445 (Fed.Cir.1996).

green Metcalf Construction Co. v. United States (2002)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 123, 134 (1995), aff'd, 77 F.3d 445 (Fed.Cir.1996).

green JWK International Corp. v. United States (2002)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 123, 134 (1995), aff'd, 77 F.3d 445 (Fed.Cir.1996). .

green Worldtravelservice v. United States (2001)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 123, 134-44 (1995).

green T & S Products, Inc. v. United States (2000)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 123, 134-35 (1995), aff'd, 77 F.3d 445 (Fed.Cir.1996), especially when the courts have not issued decisions on point. .

green Alfa Laval Separation, Inc. v. United States (2000)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 123, 135 (1995) (citing Keco Indus., Inc. v. United States, 203 Ct.Cl. 566, 579 , 492 F.2d 1200, 1207 (1974)), aff'd, 77 F.3d 445 (1996).

citing Keco Indus., Inc. v. United States, 203 Ct.Cl. 566, 579 , 492 F.2d 1200, 1207 (1974)

green J & D Maintenance & Services v. United States (1999)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 123, 134-35 (1995), aff'd 77 F.3d 445 (Fed.

green Metric Systems Corp. v. United States (1998)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 123, 134 (1995) (quoting M.

quoting M. Steinthal & Co. v. Seamans, 455 F.2d 1289, 1304 (D.C.Cir.1971)

green Stapp Towing Inc. v. United States (1995)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Bliss Co. v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 123, 133 (1995).