Allred v. United States (1995)
green
· 26 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 16 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199520102026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Davis v. United States (1996)
Mired v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 349, 353 (1995).
green
Avenal v. United States (1995)
See Allred, 33 Fed.Cl. at 356 (“[A]ny right of the plaintiffs in the IHS health care benefits is merely procedural in nature, and does not constitute property for the purposes of the Takings Clause.”).
“[A]ny right of the plaintiffs in the IHS health care benefits is merely procedural in nature, and does not constitute property for the purposes of the Takings Clause.”
green
Kalick v. United States (2013)
Defendant argues, correctly, that the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment “ ‘does not give rise to an action for money damages as required by the Tucker Act.’ ” Cf. Def.’s Reply 7 (quoting Addington, 94 Fed.Cl. at 783 ); Allred v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 349, 353 (1995) (“Case law clearly establishes that the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment neither explicitly nor implicitly obligated] the federal government to pay damages.” (alteration in original) (interna…
“Case law clearly establishes that the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment neither explicitly nor implicitly obligated] the federal government to pay damages.” (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)
green
Doe v. United States (2006)
Instead, a plaintiff must specifically identify the contract or money-mandating provision that vests this court with jurisdiction.”) (citing Allred v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 349, 353 (1995)).
green
Tsosie v. United States (2004)
Allred v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 349, 357 (1995).
green
Bassett, New Mexico LLC v. United States (2002)
Allred v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 349, 355 (1995).
green
Livengood v. United States (2001)
Allred v. United States, 33 Fed.
green
Warr v. United States (2000)
Id. “[A] plaintiff must specifically identify the contract or money-mandating provision that vests this court with jurisdiction.” Id. (citing Allred v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 349, 353 (1995)).
green
Corby Homes Ltd. Partnership v. United States (1997)
Allred v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 349, 353 (1995).
green
Sloan v. United States (1996)
Allred v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 349, 353 (1995) appeal dismissed 78 F.3d 602 (Fed.Cir.1996); Ewing v. United States, 36 Fed.Cl. 159 (1996).
green
Ewing v. United States (1996)
Allred v. United States, 33 Fed.
green
McCaster v. United States (2025)
Cir. 2006); see also Allred v. United States, 33 Fed.
explaining that IHCIA is not money mandating because of its discretionary language
green
Karuk Tribe of California v. United States (1998)
See Allred v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 349, 356 (1995).
green
Synernet Corp. v. United States (1998)
See e.g., Crocker v. United States, 37 Fed.Cl. 191, 197 , aff'd, 125 F.3d 1475 (Fed.Cir.1997), Allred v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 349, 350-51 (1995), appeal dismissed, 78 F.3d 602 (Fed.Cir.1996), Heagy v. United States, 12 Cl.Ct. 694, 697-98 (1987), aff'd, 848 F.2d 1244 (Fed.Cir.1988).
green
Crocker v. United States (1997)
See also Allred v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 349, 350-51 (1995) (APA does not provide for money relief, thus no jurisdiction in the Court of Federal Claims).
APA does not provide for money relief, thus no jurisdiction in the Court of Federal Claims
green
Sanders v. United States (1995)
See Allred v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 349, 353 (1995).