Bice v. United States (2006)
green
· 19 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 8 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Insight Public Sector, Inc. v. United States (2022)
Thus, the Navy “was not free simply to disregard [this Court’s] decision and apply its own interpretation of the statutes and regulations on remand.” Bice v. United States, 72 Fed.
green
Electronic Data System, LLC v. United States (2010)
See RCFC 52.1, Rules Committee Note (2006); see also NVT Techs., Inc. v. United States, 73 Fed.Cl. 459 , 462 n. 3 (2006); Bice v. United States, 72 Fed.Cl. 432, 441 (2006), aff'd, 2007 WL 2032849 (Fed.Cir.
green
NEQ, LLC v. United States (2009)
See RCFC 52. 1, Rules Committee Note (June 20, 2006); see also NVT Techs., Inc. v. United States, 73 Fed.Cl. 459, 462 n. 3 (2006); Bice v. United States, 72 Fed.Cl. 432, 441 (2006). .
green
Serco Inc. v. United States (2008)
See RCFC 52.1, Rules Committee Note (June 20, 2006); see also NVT Techs., Inc. v. United States, 73 Fed.Cl. 459 , 462 n. 3 (2006); Bice v. United States, 72 Fed.Cl. 432, 441 (2006). .
green
Arinc Engineering Services, LLC v. United States (2007)
See RCFC 52.1, Rules Committee Note (June 20, 2006); see also NVT Technologies, Inc. v. United States, 73 Fed.Cl. 459 , 462 n. 3 (2006); Bice v. United States, 72 Fed.Cl. 432, 441 (2006). .
green
Veterans Technology LLC v. United States (2018)
See Singer Co. v. United States, 229 Ct. Cl. 589 (Ct. Cl. 1981) (remanding case a second time, because federal agency failed to comply with the court’s remand instructions); see also Bice v. United States, 72 Fed.
determining that the federal agency “committed prejudicial error by failing to follow [the court’s] instructions on remand”
green
Bice v. United States (2008)
See Bice II, 72 Fed.Cl. at 442 .
green
NVT Technologies, Inc. v. United States (2006)
See RCFC 52.1, Rules Committee Note (June 20, 2006); see also Bice v. United States, 72 Fed.Cl. 432 (2006). .