Oenga v. United States (2010)
green
· 36 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 22 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201020182026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Fredericks v. United States (2016)
Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.Cl. 629, 637-40 (2010) (finding the leasing regulations imposed a fiduciary duty on the United States to monitor leasing activity for compliance with the law, and entering summary judgment against the United States for breach of duty).
finding the leasing regulations imposed a fiduciary duty on the United States to monitor leasing activity for compliance with the law, and entering summary judgment against the United States for breach of duty
green
Stimson Lumber Company v. United States (2020)
“Questions of law are particularly appropriate for summary judgment.” Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.
citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 6 The court’s previous rulings on and the text of 11 of these source deeds can be found in the court’s prior decisions, and the court will not include the deed language here. See Loveridge, 139 Fed. Cl. at 142 (Carstens 72/530
green
Beres v. United States (2019)
“Questions of law are particularly appropriate for summary judgment.” Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.
green
Menendez v. United States (2018)
“Questions of law are particularly appropriate for summary judgment.” Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.
green
Lucier v. United States (2018)
“Questions of law are particularly appropriate for summary judgment.” Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.
green
Flying S. Land Company v. United States (2018)
“Questions of law are particularly appropriate for summary judgment.” Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.
green
Wade v. United States (2018)
"Questions of law are particularly appropriate for summary judgment." Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.
green
Yee v. United States (2017)
“Questions of law are particularly appropriate for summary judgment.” Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.
green
Gazpromneft-Aero Kyrgyzstan LLC v. United States (2017)
“Questions of law are particularly appropriate for summary judgment.” Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.Cl. 629, 634 (2010) (citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.
green
Phipps v. United States (2016)
“Questions of law are particularly appropriate for summary judgment.” Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.Cl. 629, 634 (2010) (citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344 ; 1347 (Fed, Cir. 1999) (“Summary judgment was appropriate here [in Dana Corp.] because no material facts were disputed, many being stipulated, and the only disputed issues were issues of law.
green
Thomas v. United States (2015)
“Questions of law are particularly appropriate for summary judgment.” Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.Cl. 629, 634 (2010) (citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.
green
Old Veteran Construction, Inc. v. United States (2015)
“Questions of law are particularly appropriate for summary judgment.” Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.Cl. 629, 634 (2010) (citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.
green
Stathis v. United States (2015)
“Questions of law are particularly appropriate for summary judgment.” Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.Cl. 629, 634 (2010) (citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.Cir.1999) (“Summary judgment was appropriate here [in Dana Corp. ] because no material facts were disputed, many being stipulated, and the only disputed issues were issues of law.
citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.Cir.1999
“Questions of law are particularly appropriate for summary judgment.” Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.Cl. 629, 634 (2010) (citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.Cir.1999) (“Summary judgment was appropriate here [in Dana Corp.] because no material facts were disputed, many being stipulated, and the only disputed issues were issues of law.
citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.Cir.1999
green
Seven Resorts, Inc. v. United States (2013)
“Questions of law are particularly appropriate for summary judgment.” Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.Cl. 629, 634 (2010) (citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.Cir.1999) (“Summary judgment was appropriate here [in Dana Corp.] because no material facts were disputed, many being stipulated, and the only disputed issues were issues of law.
citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.Cir.1999
green
Ingram v. United States (2012)
“Questions of law are particularly appropriate for summary judgment.” Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.Cl. 629, 634 (2010) (citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.Cir.1999) (“Summary judgment was appropriate here [in Dana Corp.] because no material facts were disputed, many being stipulated, and the only disputed issues were issues of law.
citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.Cir.1999
green
Longnecker Property v. United States (2012)
“Questions of law are particularly appropriate for summary judgment.” Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.Cl. 629, 634 (2010) (citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.Cir.1999) (“Summary judgment was appropriate here [in Dana Corp.] because no material facts were disputed, many being stipulated, and the only disputed issues were issues of law.
citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.Cir.1999
green
Beres v. United States (2012)
“Questions of law are particularly appropriate for summary judgment.” Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.Cl. 629, 634 (2010) (citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.Cir.1999) (“Summary judgment was appropriate here [in Dana Corp.] because no material facts were disputed, many being stipulated, and the only disputed issues were issues of law.
citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.Cir.1999
green
Estate of Smith v. United States (2012)
“Questions of law are particularly appropriate for summary judgment.” Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.Cl. 629, 634 (2010) (citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.Cir.1999) (“Summary judgment was appropriate here [in Dana Corp.] because no material facts were disputed, many being stipulated, and the only disputed issues were issues of law.
citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.Cir.1999
green
Chapman Law Firm, LPA v. United States (2012)
“Questions of law are particularly appropriate for summary judgment.” Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.Cl. 629, 634 (2010) (citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.Cir.1999) (“Summary judgment was appropriate here [in Dana Corp.] because no material facts were disputed, many being stipulated, and the only disputed issues were issues of law.
citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.Cir.1999
green
Schroerlucke v. United States (2011)
“Questions of law are particularly appropriate for summary judgment.” Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.Cl. 629, 634 (2010) (citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.Cir. 1999)) (“Summary judgment was appropriate here [in Dana Corp.] because no material facts were disputed, many being stipulated, and the only disputed issues were issues of law.”).
green
Valley Realty Co. v. United States (2010)
“Questions of law are particularly appropriate for summary judgment.” Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed.Cl. 629, 634 (2010) (citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.Cir.1999) (“Summary judgment was appropriate here [in Dana Corp.] because no material facts were disputed, many being stipulated, and the only disputed issues were issues of law.
citing Dana Corp. v. United States, 174 F.3d 1344, 1347 (Fed.Cir.1999