Texas Crushed Stone Company v. United States (1994)

green · 59 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 15 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 15

Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

199420102026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Co-Steel Raritan, Inc. v. International Trade Commission (2004)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cir. · 4 citations in this opinion

Tex. Crushed Stone, 35 F.3d at 1539.

green Co-Steel Raritan, Inc. v. International Trade Commission (2004)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cir. · 4 citations in this opinion

Tex. Crushed Stone, 35 F.3d at 1539.

green Nsk Ltd. And Nsk Corporation v. The United States, and Federal-Mogul Corporation, and the Torrington Company (1997)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.

See 19 U.S.C. §§ 1673b(b)(l), 1673d(a)(l) (1988); Texas Crushed Stone Co. v. United States, 35 F.3d 1535, 1537 (Fed.Cir.1994).

green Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. And Koyo Corporation of U.S.A. v. The United States, and the Timken Company (1995)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.

See, e.g., Lasko Metal Prods., Inc. v. United States, 43 F.3d 1442 , 1446 (Fed.Cir.1994) (“In situations in which a statute does not compel, a single understanding, the Supreme Court and this court have held that ‘our duty is not to weigh the wisdom of, or to resolve any struggle between, competing views of the public interest, but rather to respect legitimate policy choices made by the agency in interpreting and applying the statute.’ ”); Texas Crushed Stone Co. v. United S…

green Committee for Fairly Traded Venezuelan Cement v. United States (2003)

Rule Authority · Ct. Intl. Trade · 9 citations in this opinion

Texas Crushed Stone II, 35 F.3d at 1541-42. 22 The Federal Circuit found that because “Congress has not ‘unambiguously’ expressed an intent on the question of what test is to be used in determining whether there has been a concentration of dumped imports in a particular region,” the Commission could use its “percent of imports” test unless that interpretation was found to be unreasonable.

green Tianjin Magnesium International Co. v. United States (2012)

Rule Authority · Ct. Intl. Trade

Texas Crushed Stone Co. v. United States, 35 F.3d 1535, 1540 (Fed.Cir.1994).

green United Enterprise & Associates v. United States (2006)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

The court is not empowered to substitute its judgment for that of the agency.” (quoting Tex. Crushed Stone Co. v. United States, 35 F.3d 1535, 1539 (1994))).

green Turner v. United States (1999)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.

Corp., 461 U.S. 402, 412-13 , 103 S.Ct. 1921 , 76 L.Ed.2d 22 (1983); Texas Crushed Stone Co. v. United States, 35 F.3d 1535, 1539-40 (Fed.Cir.1994). .

green Geneva Steel v. United States (1996)

Rule Authority · Ct. Intl. Trade

(T) -, -, 35 F.3d 1535, 1540 (1994).

green Kemira Fibres Oy v. The United States, Ronald H. Brown, Secretary of Commerce, and Department of Commerce (1995)

Cited (see also) · Fed. Cir. · signal: see also

See 19 U.S.C. § 2503 (a) (1988) (“Congress approves the trade agreements ... submitted to the Congress on June 19, 1979, and the statements of administrative action proposed to implement such trade agreements submitted to the Congress on that date.”); see also Texas Crushed Stone Co. v. United States, 35 F.3d 1535 , 1540 & n. 6 (Fed.Cir.1994).

green Co-Steel Raritan, Inc. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n (2007)

Cited (see also) · Ct. Intl. Trade · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Texas Crushed Stone Co. v. United States, 17 CIT 428 , [438,] 822 F.Supp. 773, 781 (1993), aff’d, 35 F.3d 1535 (Fed.Cir. 1994) . . ..

green Co-Steel Raritan, Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission (2007)

Cited (see also) · Ct. Intl. Trade · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Texas Crushed Stone Co. v. United States, 35 F.3d 1535 (Fed.Cir. 1994).

green Co-Steel Raritan, Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission (2005)

Cited (see also) · Ct. Intl. Trade · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Texas Crushed Stone Co. v. United States, 17 CIT 428 , [438,] 822 F.Supp. 773, 781 (1993), aff’d, 35 F.3d 1535 (Fed.Cir. 1994). . . .

green Al Tech Specialty Steel Corp. v. United States (2003)

Cited (see also) · Ct. Intl. Trade · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Texas Crushed Stone Co. v. United States, 17 CIT 428 , 822 F. Supp. 773, 781 (1993), aff’d, 35 F.3d 1535 (Fed.

green Abramson v. United States (1998)

Cited · Fed. Cl. · signal: see

See Texas Crushed Stone Co. v. United States, 35 F.3d 1535 , 1541 n. 7 (Fed.