Coffey v. PSLJ, Inc. (1990)
green
· 38 citation events
across 21 courts.
Showing the 10 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199120082026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco Corporation (1995)
However, “[g]iven the ease with which a relatively routine act of patent prosecution can be portrayed as intended to mislead or deceive, clear and convincing evidence of conduct sufficient to support an inference of culpable intent is required.” Northern Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corp., 908 F.2d 931, 939 , 15 USPQ2d 1321, 1327 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 920 , 111 S.Ct. 296 , 112 L.Ed.2d 250 (1990).
“Forfeiture [of enforceability] is not favored as a remedy for actions not shown to be culpable.”
green
McGinley v. Franklin Sports, Inc. (2000)
Northern Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corp., 908 F.2d 931, 938 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 920 , 111 S.Ct. 296 , 112 L.Ed.2d 250 (1990) (“lapse on the part of an examiner does not exculpate an applicant whose acts are intentionally deceptive”).
“lapse on the part of an examiner does not exculpate an applicant whose acts are intentionally deceptive”
green
Braintree Laboratories, Inc. v. Nephro-Tech, Inc. (2000)
Northern Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corp., 908 F.2d 931, 938 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 920 , 111 S.Ct. 296 , 112 L.Ed.2d 250 (1990) (“lapse on the part of an examiner does not exculpate an applicant whose acts are intentionally deceptive”).
“lapse on the part of an examiner does not exculpate an applicant whose acts are intentionally deceptive”
green
Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag v. Hantscho Commercial Products, Inc. And Rockwell Graphics Systems, Inc., Def… (1994)
See Northern Telecom Inc. v. Datapoint Corp., 908 F.2d 931, 934 , 15 USPQ2d 1321, 1323 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 920 , 111 S.Ct. 296 , 112 L.Ed.2d 250 (1990); In re Geiger, 815 F.2d 686, 688 , 2 USPQ2d 1276, 1278 (Fed.Cir.1987) (obviousness can not be established by combining pieces of prior art absent some “teaching, suggestion, or incentive supporting the combination”).
green
Engel Industries, Inc. v. The Lockformer Company, Iowa Precision Industries, Inc. And Met-Coil Systems Corpor… (1991)
See, e.g., Northern Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corp., 908 F.2d 931, 940 , 15 USPQ2d 1321, 1328 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 296 , 112 L.Ed.2d 250 (1990).
green
Tol-O-Matic, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Proma Produkt-Und Marketing Gesellschaft M.B.H. And Norgren C… (1991)
See, e.g., Northern Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corp., 908 F.2d 931, 939 , 15 USPQ2d 1321, 1327 (Fed.Cir.) (“Given the ease with which a relatively routine act of patent prosecution can be portrayed as intended to mislead or deceive, clear and convincing evidence of conduct sufficient to support an inference of culpable intent is required.”), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 296 , 112 L.Ed.2d 250 (1990).
green
Amgen, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Genetics Institute, Inc. (1991)
See Northern Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corp., 908 F.2d 931, 940 , 15 USPQ2d 1321, 1328 (Fed.Cir.), ce rt. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 296 , 112 L.Ed.2d 250 (1990). 6 .
green
Allied Tube and Conduit Corp. v. John Maneely Co. (2000)
See Northern Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corp., 908 F.2d 931, 936 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 920 , 111 S.Ct. 296 , 112 L.Ed.2d 250 (1990).
green
Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S (1996)
See, e.g., Northern Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corp., 908 F.2d 931, 941 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 920 , 111 S.Ct. 296 , 112 L.Ed.2d 250 (1990).
green
Eagle Comtronics, Inc. v. Northeast Filter Co. (1993)
Simmons Fastner Corp. v. Illinois Tool Works Inc., 663 F.Supp. 697 (N.D.N.Y.1987) (citing Amstar Corp. v. Envirotech Corp., 730 F.2d 1476, 1482 (Fed.Cir.1984)); see also Northern Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corp., 908 F.2d 931, 945 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 920 , 111 S.Ct. 296 , 112 L.Ed.2d 250 (1990).