How cited: Coffey v. PSLJ, Inc. · Go Syfert

Coffey v. PSLJ, Inc. (1990)

green · 38 citation events across 21 courts. Showing the 10 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199120082026
Quote Authority · Fed. Cir.
However, “[g]iven the ease with which a relatively routine act of patent prosecution can be portrayed as intended to mislead or deceive, clear and convincing evidence of conduct sufficient to support an inference of culpable intent is required.” Northern Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corp., 908 F.2d 931, 939 , 15 USPQ2d 1321, 1327 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 920 , 111 S.Ct. 296 , 112 L.Ed.2d 250 (1990).
“Forfeiture [of enforceability] is not favored as a remedy for actions not shown to be culpable.”
Quote Authority · D. Kan.
Northern Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corp., 908 F.2d 931, 938 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 920 , 111 S.Ct. 296 , 112 L.Ed.2d 250 (1990) (“lapse on the part of an examiner does not exculpate an applicant whose acts are intentionally deceptive”).
“lapse on the part of an examiner does not exculpate an applicant whose acts are intentionally deceptive”
Quote Authority · D. Kan.
Northern Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corp., 908 F.2d 931, 938 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 920 , 111 S.Ct. 296 , 112 L.Ed.2d 250 (1990) (“lapse on the part of an examiner does not exculpate an applicant whose acts are intentionally deceptive”).
“lapse on the part of an examiner does not exculpate an applicant whose acts are intentionally deceptive”
Cited · Fed. Cir. · signal: see
See Northern Telecom Inc. v. Datapoint Corp., 908 F.2d 931, 934 , 15 USPQ2d 1321, 1323 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 920 , 111 S.Ct. 296 , 112 L.Ed.2d 250 (1990); In re Geiger, 815 F.2d 686, 688 , 2 USPQ2d 1276, 1278 (Fed.Cir.1987) (obviousness can not be established by combining pieces of prior art absent some “teaching, suggestion, or incentive supporting the combination”).
Cited (see also) · Fed. Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Northern Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corp., 908 F.2d 931, 940 , 15 USPQ2d 1321, 1328 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 296 , 112 L.Ed.2d 250 (1990).
Cited (see also) · Fed. Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Northern Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corp., 908 F.2d 931, 939 , 15 USPQ2d 1321, 1327 (Fed.Cir.) (“Given the ease with which a relatively routine act of patent prosecution can be portrayed as intended to mislead or deceive, clear and convincing evidence of conduct sufficient to support an inference of culpable intent is required.”), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 296 , 112 L.Ed.2d 250 (1990).
Cited · Fed. Cir. · signal: see
See Northern Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corp., 908 F.2d 931, 940 , 15 USPQ2d 1321, 1328 (Fed.Cir.), ce rt. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 296 , 112 L.Ed.2d 250 (1990). 6 .
Cited · D. Ariz. · signal: see
See Northern Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corp., 908 F.2d 931, 936 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 920 , 111 S.Ct. 296 , 112 L.Ed.2d 250 (1990).
Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Northern Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corp., 908 F.2d 931, 941 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 920 , 111 S.Ct. 296 , 112 L.Ed.2d 250 (1990).
Cited (see also) · N.D.N.Y. · signal: see also
Simmons Fastner Corp. v. Illinois Tool Works Inc., 663 F.Supp. 697 (N.D.N.Y.1987) (citing Amstar Corp. v. Envirotech Corp., 730 F.2d 1476, 1482 (Fed.Cir.1984)); see also Northern Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corp., 908 F.2d 931, 945 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 920 , 111 S.Ct. 296 , 112 L.Ed.2d 250 (1990).